From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:00:50 -0700
On Monday 27 October 2008 19:36:58 chromatic wrote:
> I think I know how to promote primitive registers to their
> autoboxed PMCs in that function; Parrot's calling conventions should take
> care of the re
On Monday 27 October 2008 19:36:58 chromatic wrote:
> I think I know how to promote primitive registers to their
> autoboxed PMCs in that function; Parrot's calling conventions should take
> care of the rest.
Fixed in r32211. All tests pass (including the TODO test I added for this).
-- c
On Monday 27 October 2008 19:26:31 Bob Rogers wrote:
> All true. But it's unfortunate that the Parrot type system considers
> "int" and "Integer" unrelated. As a result, MMD prevents autoboxing
> (when chromatic and I had expected otherwise).
I'm not sure it's the type system as much as it is P
From: "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:32:02 -0500
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:37:36PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
>.sub 'main' :main
>foo('Hello')
>.end
>.sub foo :multi(String)
>.param pmc s
>
>s
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:18:40PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
(I suppose technically we should stop calling this a "stack trace" since
it's not a stack. But "return continuation chain trace" is just too
verbose.)
"backtrace"
Exactly the word I was looking for.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a very small snippet of tcl
Attached is a PIR-only file (no tcl required) that triggers the same
GC-related segfault (tested in r32210)
--
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 06:50:29AM -0700, François PERRAD via RT wrote:
>
> In fact, perl6.exe contains some dependencies on build tree.
> Just after a build, perl6.exe works :
This is a known item -- see line 32 of languages/perl6/README:
This binary executable feature is still somewhat exp
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:37:36PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
> .sub 'main' :main
> foo('Hello')
> .end
> .sub foo :multi(String)
> .param pmc s
>
> say s
> .end
> [...]
>Which brings us to an interesting question: How can you decide wha
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #60172]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60172 >
.sub _main
($S0) = 'blah'(:pir_only=>1)
.end
segfaults with:
0xb7e4fe84 in expand_pcc
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:14 PM, via RT Will Coleda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
> # Please include the string: [perl #60170]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60170 >
>
>
>
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #60170]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60170 >
While trying to duplicate the tcl segfault in PIR, I was able to
generate PIR that reliab
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #60166]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60166 >
Hello.
Exception handling in parrot doesn't unwind used stack frames.
Simple examp
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Turns out setting the conditional breakpoint never fired; left this
> running overnight, and it eventually came back with the segfault
> directly. Back to the drawing board.
Here is a very small snippet of tcl (with a singl
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Oct 27 13:00:01 2008 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with m
14 matches
Mail list logo
