Hi.
Congratulations, you've made a lot of progress during the last two months.
Trying to get back I read embed.c and made a trivial cleanup:
[PATCH] in attachment:
Changed struct Parrot_interp * to Parrot, following the typedef in
parrot.h (I believe).
Boris.
diff -r1.18 embed.c
21c21
< str
I read this as
"please do so here, and then you might perhaps offer your
opinions regarding the T-shirts."
I agree... but it was just three words...
And here's my 180 degree turn:
The camouflage motive is perfect:
camouflage
n : an outward semblance that misrepresents th
Please, no military.
--
Boris Tschirschwitz
University of British Columbia
Mathematics Department
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Christian Klauss wrote:
> military style :
>
> http://www.gfxspace.com/parrot/parrot3.gif
>
>
Hi.
During the vtable discussions lately, a complex type was used in examples
a lot. I have a more or less complete implementation of a complex number
PMC. After writing it, I started wondering, if this wouldn't just be
unneccessary overhead at this point, so I let it sleep. But if there's
intere
a GC
3) should find a soulution for, because it is a problem
Boris.
--
Boris Tschirschwitz
University of British Columbia
Mathematics Department
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
I suppose that it is not possible to use non build-in PMC's, yet.
Therefore I have implemented the GNU Scientific library complex number
type as a build-in class, just for myself.
Since there is no complex type so far I wonder if there is interest in
having as much basic functionality as sens
Hi.
I read vtables.pod about making your own classes. It explains the 7 steps
neccessary to get your new class compiled in after you've written the
..pmc, .c and .h files--if it is a build-in class.
I am just trying to implement a gsl_complex class for complex numbers, but
I don't know how to ma
Now I forgot to attach the files :)
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Boris Tschirschwitz wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I just implemented some opcodes for the 'GNU Scientific Library'.
> The opcodes are in the file 'gsl.ops', and tests are in 'gsl.t'
> These are very f
Hi.
I just implemented some opcodes for the 'GNU Scientific Library'.
The opcodes are in the file 'gsl.ops', and tests are in 'gsl.t'
These are very few and rather uninteresting ops, I was mostly checking if
I know how to do it.
I submit them already because:
* I'd like to hear if you think that
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Boris Tschirschwitz wrote:
> Config.pl
Configure.pl
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, David & Lisa Jacobs wrote:
>
> > This is the same problem I reported. The vtable.ops is not being generated
> > so all the pmc tests will fail (i.e., the ops don't exist).
> >
> > David
>
> Right, the tests are still broken on my computer, too.
> Boris.
But they pass if you
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, David & Lisa Jacobs wrote:
> This is the same problem I reported. The vtable.ops is not being generated
> so all the pmc tests will fail (i.e., the ops don't exist).
>
> David
Right, the tests are still broken on my computer, too.
Boris.
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Running as root, perhaps? perldoc doesn't like that.
Ha, thanks so much, I forgot to leave root after an 'su' to make install
something.
Boris.
That's the strangest thing:
I am reading perldocs for days with 'perldoc', but now it tells me I'll
have to install the perldoc package. (Using Debian on an i686)
Sorry, apparently it's all my stupid fault, I'll just have to find out
why.
Boris.
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
> ...
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> ...
> >Yes, it runs, but starting with PMC tests the tests fail (pmc3.pasm: no
> >opcode add)
>
> Hmmm. If you haven't, try a make clean first. I'll poke around here and see
> if I can duplicate the problem.
Doesn't help, exactly the same message.
Boris.
> >make[1]: Entering directory '/home/boris/parrot/docs'
> > perldoc -u ../Parrot/PackFile.pm > packfile-perl.pod
> >make[1]: *** [packfile-perl.pod] Error 1
> >make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/boris/parrot/docs'
> >make: [docs/.dummy] Error 2
>
> Hmmm. That's the last of what prints for
There seems to be a problem during compilation of the latest cvs version
(after 6pm): After starting make:
..
..
..
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/boris/parrot/docs'
perldoc -u ../Parrot/PackFile.pm > packfile-perl.pod
make[1]: *** [packfile-perl.pod] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving director
Hi.
How do I tell parrot to use the obscure opcodes?
Or more general, if I add some opcodes in a file like gsl.ops,
how do I tell parrot about them?
Boris.
ndependent optimization hints to be used by an
optimizer, when optimization is required.
Boris.
------
Boris Tschirschwitz
University of British Columbia
Mathematics Department
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, David & Lisa Jacobs wrote:
> I have a LOT
t 09:29 PM 12/29/2001 -0800, Boris Tschirschwitz wrote:
> >Hi.
> >
> >Since there is a code police now:
> >I am sure that no one in his or her right mind would ever want something
> >like
> > opcode_t * code_start
> >
> >in beautified code.
this direction.
I suggest
opcode_t* code_start
Sorry for just mentioning petty things so far, I am just getting into it.
Boris.
--
Boris Tschirschwitz
University of British Columbia
Mathematics Department
email: boris at math dot ubc dot ca
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Jason Gloudon wrote:
> branch is a relative branch, look at the code generated for it:
>
> static opcode_t *
> Parrot_branch_ic (opcode_t cur_opcode[], struct Parrot_Interp * interpreter) {
> return cur_opcode + cur_opcode[1];
> }
Yes, I see.
In parrot assmebly it looks li
Why is parrot/docs/core_ops.pod not under version control?
For example we should change the explanation under
=item B(ic) to
Branch to the location specified by $1
since that's what it does.
Boris.
> Will I be able to do someting like
> mov I3,45e3
> or are the BIGs going to be implemented as PMCs?
Ok, a look at he actual interpreter shows that this is possible, but it
should really be
set I3,45e3
Then I really believe that the vector thing would be worthwhile.
Is there an ar
Hi.
When I am reading about Perl internal datatypes I wonder if they are going
to be Parrot internal types, especially the BIGINTs and BIGNUMs.
Will I be able to do someting like
mov I3,45e3
or are the BIGs going to be implemented as PMCs?
I ask because I have the following idea:
I think
25 matches
Mail list logo
