Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:35:18AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
You have to used global labels for subroutines, then all is fine.
But being able to craft input that causes IMCC to segfault (actually
any form of segfault) is bad on principle, isn't it?
For sure. But this i
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:15:21AM +, Clinton A. Pierce wrote:
> Causes IMCC to segfault. Asking IMCC to generate pasm produces reasonable
> code:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:35:18AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Clinton A. Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > .sub _main
> > .su
Clinton A. Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .sub _main
> .sub dummy
> call inner1
> call inner2
You have to used global labels for subroutines, then all is fine.
leo
# New Ticket Created by "Clinton A. Pierce"
# Please include the string: [perl #22645]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=22645 >
I'm exploring IMCC's ability to have nested subs. The following code:
.sub _mai
