On 11/08/07, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:00:33PM +0200, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> > > Within the past few months we've standardized on always quoting
> > > type names in PIR, so the above needs to read
> > >
> > > $P1 = new 'String'
> > >
> > > Throug
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:00:33PM +0200, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> > Within the past few months we've standardized on always quoting
> > type names in PIR, so the above needs to read
> >
> > $P1 = new 'String'
> >
> > Throughout Parrot you'll find lots of examples and code that
> > use older depr
> Within the past few months we've standardized on always quoting
> type names in PIR, so the above needs to read
>
> $P1 = new 'String'
>
> Throughout Parrot you'll find lots of examples and code that
> use older deprecated syntaxes -- they should probably be
> changed to the new syntax as wel
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 04:20:04PM -0700, Colin Kuskie wrote:
> This patch adds a new tutorial file, 56_defined.pir, which talks
> about the concept of definedness.
>...
> +=head1 defined
> +
> +The defined function tells you if the contents of a PMC register is defined
> or no
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie
# Please include the string: [perl #44553]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44553 >
This patch adds a new tutorial file, 56_defined.pir, which talks about the
concept of d
