On Tue Sep 09 15:06:38 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> >
> > Just for clarification: IIUC, the n_* opcodes and their semantics
> > aren't really "going away" -- they're simply being renamed to not
> > have the leading "n_" prefix. It's the existing "add", "sub",
>
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Just for clarification: IIUC, the n_* opcodes and their semantics
aren't really "going away" -- they're simply being renamed to not
have the leading "n_" prefix. It's the existing "add", "sub",
"mul", "div", etc. opcodes that are being eliminated.
Yes. That is, c
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 05:20:45PM -0700, Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:48 AM, via RT Patrick R. Michaud
> > > The infix and n_infix opcodes cause segfaults when invoked with
> > > string arguments. (Kubuntu 8.04, x86, r27472)
> > > $ cat z.pir
> > > .sub main :mai
On Tue May 13 08:05:08 2008, coke wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:48 AM, via RT Patrick R. Michaud
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
> > # Please include the string: [perl #54110]
> > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this
> is
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:48 AM, via RT Patrick R. Michaud
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
> # Please include the string: [perl #54110]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #54110]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=54110 >
The infix and n_infix opcodes cause segfaults when invoked with
string arguments.
