>Would it also be your job to do porting of subversion to VMS, so that we
>could consider replacing CVS with something that lets clients do directory
>moves? :-)
Sadly, no. :)
But I can tell you that I am actively investigating the use of
subversion for future use on perl.org projects. We're st
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 10:14:39AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote:
> Nicholas Clark writes:
> >This seems to be a good idea. I'd commit it, except that it needs more
> >than commit access to move a directory with CVS. Who has enough shell
> >access to cvs.perl.org to do this? [assuming it does want to
I'll implement the
>> befunge 98 specs, and the same interpreter will be able to interpret 93
>> ou 98 befunge code...
>> I'm sorry, 'cause I know cvs does not handle very well directory
>> renaming.
>
>This seems to be a good idea. I'd commit
98 specs, and the same interpreter will be able to interpret 93
> ou 98 befunge code...
> I'm sorry, 'cause I know cvs does not handle very well directory
> renaming.
This seems to be a good idea. I'd commit it, except that it needs more
than commit access to move a dir
, 'cause I know cvs does not handle very well directory
renaming.
Thanks,
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
