On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 10:46:03AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 04:30:06PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok, here's a first pass. Most of it is pretty straightforward
>
> One spot I may have goofed: I chan
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 04:30:06PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >
> > Ok, here's a first pass. Most of it is pretty straightforward
One spot I may have goofed: I changed some initializations from "" to
NULL, which is, of course, rather a differ
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 09:23:36AM +0100, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
> Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > /* strcon(...) converts string values into PIR string constants */
> > static char*
> > strcon(const char* s, int len)
>
> Haven't looked at the code yet, but I'll just observe
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 04:30:06PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> Ok, here's a first pass. Most of it is pretty straightforward, but one
> thing is worth noting:
>
> The code uses both signed and unsigned chars, with and without the 'const'
> qualifier. I gather this is a deliberate part of a
Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- parrot-orig/compilers/p6ge/p6ge_gen.c Fri Nov 19 08:53:40 2004
> +++ parrot-andy/compilers/p6ge/p6ge_gen.c Fri Nov 19 14:43:43 2004
> /* strcon(...) converts string values into PIR string constants */
> static char*
> -strcon(const char* s,
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > So, if someone'd like to take a shot at thumping the template
> > makefile bits to add in compilers/p6ge to the basic build, that'd be
> > great. Grovelling over the code in there to scrub out portability
>
At 10:58 AM -0500 11/19/04, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
So, if someone'd like to take a shot at thumping the template
makefile bits to add in compilers/p6ge to the basic build, that'd be
great. Grovelling over the code in there to scrub out portability
issues
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> So, if someone'd like to take a shot at thumping the template
> makefile bits to add in compilers/p6ge to the basic build, that'd be
> great. Grovelling over the code in there to scrub out portability
> issues would also be good.
I'll take a look at this
Folks,
Since the grammar engine that Patrick's working on is going to be
part of the base parrot kit (given the number of languages that have
perl 5 compatible regex implementations, we might as well make it so
the *real* perl 5, and perl 6, regex engine's there to be used in
their parrot incar
