Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-04 Thread H . Merijn Brand
On Wed 03 Oct 2001 16:55, Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? AIX 4.3.3, vac 5.0.2.1 I had to manually add the -L/... from my config's ldflags to find the required libs. After that: i2:/pro/3gl/CPAN/parrot 108 > make test

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Cozens) writes: > Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? except that `make test` always just tells me tat `test' is up to date, then both cygwin and darwin looks good. - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:08:54PM -0700, Benjamin Stuhl wrote: > # got: 'failure > ' What no debugging print output? -- We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise. -- Larry Wall

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Benjamin Stuhl
nt: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 09:51 > # To: Brent Dax > # Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # Subject: Re: Parrot 0.0.2 > # > # > # OK, let's try and clear this up. > # > # On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:39:32AM -0700, Brent Dax > wrote: > # > # got: 'Seem t

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Brent Dax
--Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configure pumpking for Perl 6 They *will* pay for what they've done. # -Original Message- # From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] # Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 09:51 # To: Brent Dax # Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Subject: Re: Parrot

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Brent Dax
Simon Cozens: # On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:51:14PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: # > > # got: 'Seem to have negative Nx # > > not ok # > > # expected: 'Seem to have negative Nx # > > Seem to have positive Nx after pop # # So pop_n is broken on Win32. Did you see any compiler warnings # i

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
Simon -- > Don't worry, Windows being broken has bought you some time... I don't really need time (since its done). But, I'll take this as "go ahead and commit it when you're ready" (which is now). Regards, -- Gregor _ /

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:51:14PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > > # got: 'Seem to have negative Nx > > not ok > > # expected: 'Seem to have negative Nx > > Seem to have positive Nx after pop So pop_n is broken on Win32. Did you see any compiler warnings in the stacks code? -- perl

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:53:40PM -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote: > I'd like to have a working macro facility in the assembler for 0.0.2, > please. Don't worry, Windows being broken has bought you some time... -- "In space 'cat scream.au | tee /dev/null > /dev/audio'..." - Ben, in the monastery

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
OK, let's try and clear this up. On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:39:32AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: > # got: 'Seem to have negative Nx > not ok > ' > # expected: 'Seem to have negative Nx > Seem to have positive Nx after pop > ' Don't know what's going on here. > t/op/string.NOK 4#

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
Simon -- > Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? I'm about to post a patch that fixes macros in the assembler, and along the way adds label arithmetic, which allows t/basic.t to have all tests enabled (and passing). I'd like to have a working macro facility in the a

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Brent Dax
Simon Cozens: # On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:39:32AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: # > Win2K non-Cygwin is looking a little sick to its stomach: # # Dammit. There had to be a show-stopper, didn't there? And of course it had to be Microsoft. :^) --Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configure pumpking for Perl

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: > FWIW, Linux/x86 long long/long double/long long has a few glitches. That's a good test platform because sizeof(long double) is 12 there, while sizeof(long long) is 8, but Parrot/Opcode.pm still seems to assume $nvivsize = $PConfig{numvalsize}/$P

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:39:32AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: > Win2K non-Cygwin is looking a little sick to its stomach: Dammit. There had to be a show-stopper, didn't there? -- The Blit is a nice terminal, but it runs emacs.

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Brent Dax
Simon Cozens: # Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? Win2K non-Cygwin is looking a little sick to its stomach: Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195] (C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp. C:\Brent\Visual Studio Projects\Perl 6\parrot\parrot>pmake test Readin

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 12:14 pm, Andy Dougherty wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Simon Cozens wrote: > > This is looking releasable. > > (If you include my printf (long) casts) I agree. > > Nice work. FWIW, Linux/x86 long long/long double/long long has a few glitches. Whammo 20> test_prog test

Re: [PATCH] printf bandaids (Was Re: Parrot 0.0.2)

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:13:51PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: > All tests successful, 5 subtests skipped. In which case, I'm happy to pretend this is a format string fix. :) (Applied, thanks) > printing out an INTVAL. I see you're already conforming to the New Order. :) > Fortunately, perl

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Simon Cozens wrote: > This is looking releasable. (If you include my printf (long) casts) I agree. Nice work. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

[PATCH] printf bandaids (Was Re: Parrot 0.0.2)

2001-10-03 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 11:44:25AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > It's not a core platform, but Linux/Sparc (intvalsize=8) is still not > > very happy: > > OK; I'll have to check that out. The Sparc I have here has intvalsize=4 > by default. Perhaps I

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Mattia Barbon
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs wrote: > >Here is the patch to get make test to work on cygwin. There may be a better >way to do it. It is actually courtesy of someone else, but I'll have to go >look to see who (unless you speak up :) > >It basically takes >test: > ...do tests >and r

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:52:19PM +0200, H. Merijn Brand wrote: > HP-UX 11.00 w/ HP ANSI C > -DDEBUGGING -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE -I/pro/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE >-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I./include Thanks. Also: $ uname -a SunOS neptune 5.8 Generic_108528-10 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 Ho

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread H . Merijn Brand
On Wed 03 Oct 2001 16:55, Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? HP-UX 11.00 w/ HP ANSI C -DDEBUGGING -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE -I/pro/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I./include l1:/pro/3gl/CPAN/parrot 112

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 11:44:25AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: > It's not a core platform, but Linux/Sparc (intvalsize=8) is still not > very happy: OK; I'll have to check that out. The Sparc I have here has intvalsize=4 by default. -- "Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it mi

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 11:44 am, Andy Dougherty wrote: > Finally, trying a 32-bit opcode_t and a 64-bit INTVAL, I get Mixed sizes are completely hosed. But we need to decide how they should behave before we start randomly applying bandaids. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 03:55:55PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > > Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? > > FWIW, I've just successfully built Parrot on Linux x86, Linux Sparc, > Linux IA64, Tru64, Linux Alpha, FreeBSD Alpha,

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
so that cygwin really thinks there is something to do. -Original Message- From: Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs To: 'Simon Cozens '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' Sent: 10/3/2001 10:12 AM Subject: RE: Parrot 0.0.2 Cygwin is fine. Although I still have to change the makefile to ge

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Wizard
> Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? Just built on Cygwin on Win2k: (make test still doesn't work) $ perl t/harness t/op/basic..ok, 1/5 skipped: label constants unimplemented in assembler t/op/bitwiseok t/op/integerok t/op/number.ok

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 03:55:55PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? FWIW, I've just successfully built Parrot on Linux x86, Linux Sparc, Linux IA64, Tru64, Linux Alpha, FreeBSD Alpha, and FreeBSD x86. I'm happy. -- The PROPER way to

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
Cygwin is fine. Although I still have to change the makefile to get make test to work right. -Original Message- From: Simon Cozens To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/3/2001 9:55 AM Subject: Parrot 0.0.2 Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? -- > I&#x

Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? -- > I'm a person, not a piece of property. Happily, I'm both! - Lionel and Stephen Harris.