Re: patch: assembly listings from assembler

2001-09-13 Thread Damien Neil
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 06:41:00PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 01:42 PM 9/13/2001 -0700, Benjamin Stuhl wrote: > >Could we please get in the habit of adding a -c or a -u to > >our CVS diffs, just as we would with normal patches? > > Yes, please! > > All diffs posted to the list should be eit

Re: patch: assembly listings from assembler

2001-09-13 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 01:42 PM 9/13/2001 -0700, Benjamin Stuhl wrote: >Could we please get in the habit of adding a -c or a -u to >our CVS diffs, just as we would with normal patches? Yes, please! All diffs posted to the list should be either -c or -u diffs. Both can be fed to patch, and both read far more easily

Re: patch: assembly listings from assembler

2001-09-13 Thread Benjamin Stuhl
--- Brian Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Index: assemble.pl > === > RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/assemble.pl,v > retrieving revision 1.14 > diff -r1.14 assemble.pl > 7a8 > > use Getopt::Long; > 9,12c10,33 > < my $opt_c; > <

patch: assembly listings from assembler

2001-09-13 Thread Brian Wheeler
This patch does a couple of things: * uses Getopt::Long for options. -c is now --checksyntax. I wasn't sure how to keep compatible (patches welcome!) * options include: --help --version --verbose --output=file