string eval, and the second
issue's a SMOP. (Though involving the parser on the fly would make it easier)
Dan
--"it's like this"-------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL
.
Dan
--"it's like this"-------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
down a source filter
for a while and eating the filter's output)
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:28 PM 12/2/00 -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's more than just the parser. You've got the bytecode compiler and
possibly the optimizer as well, and they're probably going to be all, or
mostly, C. On the other hand they might not have any
as we'd like. I think we're going to end up with a rather
odd mutant beast. Hopefully one that's understandable by reasonably sane
people...
Dan
--"it's like this"-------
Da
king it configurable if we can handle 90% of the
cases with source filtering that have some hooks into the parser so they
can pass in hints and suchlike things.
Dan
------"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski
At 09:10 AM 11/28/00 -1000, Tim Jenness wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
---
int perl6_parse(PerlInterp *interp,
void *source,
int flags,
void *extra_pointer);
The third parameter is the flags
At 03:15 PM 11/28/00 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 03:34:22PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 01:25 PM 11/28/00 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 07:03:49PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
Applying the maxim that any software design problem can
r character-by-character hardcoded state
machine.
Dan
------"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
run over text and ultimately fail, but
rather cases where we need to chuck out part of what we have and restart?
Dan
--"it's like this"-------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL
At 04:50 PM 11/27/00 -0500, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 04:41:34PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Okay, here's a question for those of you with more experience at parsers
than I have. (Which would be about everyone)
Is there any reasonable case where we would need
g that can provide bytes to the regex engine until it stops asking
for them. Some magic or other, though, will get us what we need.
Dan
--"it's like this"-------
Dan Sugalski
12 matches
Mail list logo
