Re: Support for interactive interpreters...

2001-01-17 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:03:05AM -0200, Branden wrote: I work with Perl and I also work with Tcl, and one thing I actually like about Tcl is that it's interactive like a shell, i.e. it gives you a prompt, where you type commands in and, if you type a whole command by the end of the line, it

Re: Backtracking through the source

2000-11-30 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:57:23PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: My only worry is, how do we reconcile this with the idea of Perl having an easily modifiable grammar and being a good environment for little-language stuff? That's a good question, and it depends on what Larry's thinking of for

Re: Backtracking through the source

2000-11-30 Thread Simon Cozens
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 11:54:31AM +, Simon Cozens wrote: I categorically do *NOT* want perl6-internals to turn into a basic course in compiler design, purely for the benefit of those who know nothing at all about what they're trying to achieve. I'd like Perl 6 to be a masterwork

Re: Backtracking through the source

2000-11-28 Thread Simon Cozens
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 06:58:57PM +, Tom Hughes wrote: I didn't say that having infinite lookahead was better than allowing backtracking. I simply said that the two were equivalent and that any problem that can be solved by one can be solved by the other. Fair enough. That's quite a