On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:10:07PM +, Richard Proctor wrote:
: On Thu 14 Nov, Michael G Schwern wrote:
: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:19:47PM +, Andy Wardley wrote:
: > > Can we overload + in Perl 6 to work as both numeric addition
: > > and string concatenation, depending on the type of th
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Me wrote:
> > My complete knowledge comes from
> > archive.develooper.com/perl6-language...
> > (search for "superpositions").
>
> I find google (rather than develooper's
> archive/search) the best tool for most
> searching of p6lang. Unfortunately even
> google only goes bac
> My complete knowledge comes from
> archive.develooper.com/perl6-language...
> (search for "superpositions").
I find google (rather than develooper's
archive/search) the best tool for most
searching of p6lang. Unfortunately even
google only goes back so far, and doesn't
search punctuation.
Perl
--- Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > --- Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I wonder what would happen if you had a junction of
> >> continuations. Producing something practical is left as an
> exercise
> >> for the interested r
Hey Damian...
What is the expected output of this:
my $x = 0|1; my $xsum = 0; my $xmean;
my $y = 0|1;
my $z = $x * $y; my $zsum = 0; my $zmean;
$xsum += $x.pick for 1..1000;
$xmean = $xsum / 1000;
print "Expected value of \$x is $xmean\n";
$zsum = $z.pick for 1..1000;
$zmean =
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> e.g.
>
> I can force all variables starting with 'A' to be constant .
> now 'A' is special sigil .
>
> ( can I ??? )
> ( probably this is something perl should avoid somehow )
And by extension, you can force all variables starting with 'hwpstr' to
be a certain
--- Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder what would happen if you had a junction of
> continuations. Producing something practical is left as an exercise
> for the interested reader.
Isn't this effectively "paste(1)" ?
That is,
my $outfh = all(@input_handles);
while (<$outfh>) pr
Larry Wall <> writes:
>
> It would be really funny to use cent ¢, pound £, or yen ¥ as a
> sigil, though...
>
> > C'mon, everybody's doing it! First one's free, kid... ;-)
>
> People who believe slippery slope arguments should never go skiing.
>
just (re)reading *old* threads :
Luke Palmer writes:
>
> for parallel(<>, 0..Inf) -> $line, $count {
> FIRST { $line //= "#!/usr/bin/perl" }
> # processing...
> NEXT { print STDERR "Next line...\n" }
> LAST { print STDERR "Done\n" }
> }
>
>
> Also, keep in mind that that C function can be any (p
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > The blocks below the given get evaluated under the following
> > conditions
>
> > all: $falsecount == 0
> > any: $truecount > 0
> > some: $falsecount > 0
> > none: $truecount == 0
> >
> > So anyway, "none" replaces the old "default" option, and the
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:37:51 +1100 (EST)
> > From: "Timothy S. Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > X-SMTPD: qpsmtpd/0.12, http://develooper.com/code/qpsmtpd/
> >
> >
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Ken Fox wrote:
> Andy Wardley wrote:
>
> > Can we overload + in Perl 6 to work as both numeric addition
> > and string concatenation ...
>
> Isn't there some nifty Unicode operator perl6 could enlist? ;)
>
> How about concatenating adjacent operands? ANSI C does this
> with
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 07:05:26AM +1100, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
> > --
> > given ($this) {
> > when $that_happens { "Have a party" }
> > when $that_doesnt_happen { "Sing" }
> >
I wonder what would happen if you had a junction of
continuations. Producing something practical is left as an exercise
for the interested reader.
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jan
Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Luke Palmer asked:
>
>> When junctions collapse,
>
> Sigh, not another one of those dreadful reality TV shows:
>
> When animals attack
> When drivers collide
> When junctions collapse
>
> Next we'll get:
>
> When mailing lists exp
Damian Conway writes:
> Micholas Clarke asked:
>
> > If a subroutine explicitly needs access to its invocant's topic, what is so
> > wrong with having an explicit read-write parameter in the argument list that
> > the caller of the subroutine is expected to put $_ in?
>
> Absolutely nothin
16 matches
Mail list logo
