On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 09:16:21AM -0600, Thomas A. Boyer wrote:
> The original question was "how do I label my code as Perl 5?" The
> correct answer, according to Apocalypse 1, is to start your source with
> "package." If you didn't want to put your code in a package, then start
> it with "pack
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 11:16, Thomas A. Boyer wrote:
> Here is the relevant paragraph from the apocalypse:
> I hereby declare that a |package| declaration at the front of a
> file unambiguously indicates you are parsing Perl 5 code. If
> you want to write a Perl 6 module or class, it'll start
Thomas A. Boyer wrote:
The original question was "how do I label my code as Perl 5?" The
correct answer, according to Apocalypse 1, is to start your source with
"package." If you didn't want to put your code in a package, then start
it with "package main".
The other question was "how do I label
Matthew Walton wrote:
Thomas A. Boyer wrote:
Matthew Walton wrote:
That could be problematic, because if Perl 6 sees something like:
my %myhash;
%myhash{'foo'} = 'bar';
It's going to think 'ahah', perl 5'. Because it doesn't contain any
Perl 6 keyword (such as 'module' or 'class'), as Mark sai
At 4:07 PM +0100 4/13/04, Matthew Walton wrote:
Thomas A. Boyer wrote:
Matthew Walton wrote:
That could be problematic, because if Perl 6 sees something like:
my %myhash;
%myhash{'foo'} = 'bar';
Is it going to think 'ahah, perl 6' or 'perl 5 with errors'?
It's going to think 'ahah', perl 5'. Be
David Cantrell writes:
> A few days ago I briefly discussed with Nicholas Clark (current perl 5.8
> pumpking) about making perl5 code forward-compatible with perl6. A
> quick look through the mailing list archives didn't turn up anything
> obvious, and I don't recall any mechanism being presented
Thomas A. Boyer wrote:
Matthew Walton wrote:
That could be problematic, because if Perl 6 sees something like:
my %myhash;
%myhash{'foo'} = 'bar';
Is it going to think 'ahah, perl 6' or 'perl 5 with errors'?
It's going to think 'ahah', perl 5'. Because it doesn't contain any Perl
6 keyword (su
Matthew Walton wrote:
Mark J. Reed wrote:
On 2004-04-13 at 13:16:02, David Cantrell wrote:
Perl 6, we are promised, will try to run "legacy" code unchanged. How
will it spot such legacy code?
My understanding has been that perl6 will assume a program is Perl 5
unless
it sees a Perl 6 keywo
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 02:27:08PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
> David Cantrell skribis 2004-04-13 13:16 (+0100):
> > Perl 6, we are promised, will try to run "legacy" code unchanged. How
> > will it spot such legacy code? Doing this reliably is a hard problem,
> > but we can make it easier. I suggest t
I have confused assignement and initialisation in my previous
mail. Because they are two different operations, there is no
problem they have different semantics. A6 described both
operations. It described pairs as arguments used to initialize
parameters and pairs in assignement.
--
stef
David Cantrell skribis 2004-04-13 13:16 (+0100):
> Perl 6, we are promised, will try to run "legacy" code unchanged. How
> will it spot such legacy code? Doing this reliably is a hard problem,
> but we can make it easier. I suggest that people put:
> use perl5;
Why change what already works?
Mark J. Reed wrote:
On 2004-04-13 at 13:16:02, David Cantrell wrote:
Perl 6, we are promised, will try to run "legacy" code unchanged. How
will it spot such legacy code?
My understanding has been that perl6 will assume a program is Perl 5 unless
it sees a Perl 6 keyword such as 'module' or 'c
On 2004-04-13 at 13:16:02, David Cantrell wrote:
> Perl 6, we are promised, will try to run "legacy" code unchanged. How
> will it spot such legacy code?
My understanding has been that perl6 will assume a program is Perl 5 unless
it sees a Perl 6 keyword such as 'module' or 'class'.
--
Mark
A few days ago I briefly discussed with Nicholas Clark (current perl 5.8
pumpking) about making perl5 code forward-compatible with perl6. A
quick look through the mailing list archives didn't turn up anything
obvious, and I don't recall any mechanism being presented in any of the
Apocalypses, so .
14 matches
Mail list logo
