Thanks for all the comments. I started this thing as a goof, but I can
already see that it will serve dual purposes. Presenting information
in such a form can lead people to further insights and questions.
Deborah Pickett's comments in this thread are an example. (For some
real inspiring
Uri Guttman wrote:
are you going to predict any new operators based on missing boxes as
mendeleev did? :)
Funny you should ask! It is clear that there is a missing list
concatenate operator, and that its spelling should be ~~. Alas, that
is already taken by smart match. On the other hand,
Not to beat a dead horse, but
I've updated the Periodic table with almost all the changes that people
here sent me, as well as reading a few more threads and references.
This will be the last update for some time. I'll be uploading a
version to cafepress so people can get posters,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Lentczner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 7:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Periodic Table of the Operators
Not to beat a dead horse, but
I've updated the Periodic table with almost all the changes that people
