Author: pmichaud
Date: 2009-06-12 18:29:50 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27060
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[spec]: Correct buglet in example --
squaring elements of array is @a ?\194?\187**?\194?\187 2, not @a [**] 2.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Author: pmichaud
Date: 2009-06-12 18:30:25 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27061
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[spec]: Correct typo: fullwith -- fullwidth
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-12 18:33:26 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27062
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[Containers] add @array.rotate, define push and unshift to return array
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-12 18:34:34 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27063
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[Containers] default rotation is 1
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-12 18:47:24 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27064
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[Containers] more clarifications
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
I am tickled pink to see an Array rotate method in the settings spec
S032, as I was thinking of writing up a little discussion on the very
topic.
Has there been discussion on using array rotate on multi-dimensional
arrays? Being able to pass in a vector as the amount to rotate would
be useful.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:02 AM, yarynot@gmail.com wrote:
I am tickled pink to see an Array rotate method in the settings spec
S032, as I was thinking of writing up a little discussion on the very
topic.
Has there been discussion on using array rotate on multi-dimensional
arrays? Being
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-12 19:18:58 +0200 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27066
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] tweak rangechars not to be limited to \w
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
Putting this in a new thread, as I'd like to discuss it separately
from refinements to Array.rotate
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Jon Langdatawea...@gmail.com wrote:
With a multi-dimensional array, a number of transforms can be considered:
* you can rearrange the elements along a given
I think any 1D op could be transformed to do the right thing on a
multidimensional array, with some sort or hyperop or reduction
transform. Rotate, reverse, even add/subtract can be told do your
thing along this vector and return a usefully dimensioned result.
Need to work on other things at the
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:58 AM, yarynot@gmail.com wrote:
* you can rearrange the dimensions themselves (e.g., transpose).
Reflecting on 2 or more axes creates a transposition.
No, it doesn't:
@a = (1, 2, 3; 4, 5, 6; 7, 8, 9);
Reflecting on two axes would result in:
@a = (9, 8,
Ok, There's one thing that is not clear in the thread, which is when an
array is multidimensional or not...
For instance:
@a = (1, 2, 3; 4, 5, 6; 7, 8, 9);
Will produce a flatten array, because list assignment causes flattening,
so the dimensionality was lost.
It is important to remember that
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Ruosodan...@ruoso.com wrote:
Ok, There's one thing that is not clear in the thread, which is when an
array is multidimensional or not...
For instance:
�...@a = (1, 2, 3; 4, 5, 6; 7, 8, 9);
Will produce a flatten array, because list assignment causes
Em Sex, 2009-06-12 às 11:52 -0700, Jon Lang escreveu:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Ruosodan...@ruoso.com wrote:
Ok, There's one thing that is not clear in the thread, which is when an
array is multidimensional or not...
For instance:
@a = (1, 2, 3; 4, 5, 6; 7, 8, 9);
Will
We also need to consider the dimension of referentiality. I can see
three levels here. Given
@a.mung
the .mung could return
A) a modified @a (treat @a as mutable)
B) a new array (treat @a as immutable)
C) a remapped array whose elements refer back to @a's elements
Currently
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 04:00:10PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
: Em Sex, 2009-06-12 às 11:52 -0700, Jon Lang escreveu:
: On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Ruosodan...@ruoso.com wrote:
: Ok, There's one thing that is not clear in the thread, which is when an
: array is multidimensional
Larry mused:
�...@a.mung
the .mung could return
A) a modified @a (treat @a as mutable)
B) a new array (treat @a as immutable)
C) a remapped array whose elements refer back to @a's elements
Currently .rotate is defined as A, but I could easily switch it to B,
I, for one, would
Damian Conway wrote:
In fact, I would even be happy with requiring @a.=push and @a.=shift, if
it meant that there were *no* special cases. One extra character is a
small price to pay for perfect SWIM (and not just Say What I Mean,
the real benefit is the other SWIM: See What I Meant).
I don't
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-06-13 01:47:29 +0200 (Sat, 13 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 27073
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[Containers] define .rotate more like a PDL slice, rely on other ops for exact
semantics
Modified:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:25:23AM +0200, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Damian Conway wrote:
In fact, I would even be happy with requiring @a.=push and @a.=shift, if
it meant that there were *no* special cases. One extra character is a
small price to pay for perfect SWIM (and not just Say What I Mean,
20 matches
Mail list logo
