Re: ^method ?

2005-05-15 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 15/05/05 11:17 -0400, Rob Kinyon wrote: On 5/15/05, Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Autrijus Tang skribis 2005-05-15 19:28 (+0800): On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 01:19:53PM +0200, Juerd wrote: Or was your choice of words poor, and did you not mean to discuss the dot's *default*, but

Re: ^method ?

2005-05-15 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 15/05/05 22:48 +0100, Matthew Walton wrote: . On 15 May 2005, at 16:17, Rob Kinyon wrote: Right now, P6 has $?SELF and I'm saying that instead of using $?SELF, we should use $self wherever $?SELF would be used. $_ is still the topic and would be the default invocant if you have

S27 Draft

2005-04-12 Thread Brian Ingerson
I've taken a shot at starting a Synopsis 27 as well: http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/docs/S27draft.pod Cheers, Brian

S26 Draft

2005-04-10 Thread Brian Ingerson
Per autrijus request, I have written a preliminary Synopsis 26 -- Perl Documentation. For your ripping apart pleasures: http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/docs/S26draft.pod Cheers, Brian

Re: S26 Draft

2005-04-10 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 10/04/05 09:58 -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote: On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 14:02 +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote: Please don't be lazy, everyone, and look at this: http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/docs/ There are some more drafts that should be reviewed, and more will probably follow. Can we

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] A more extensible/flexible POD (ROUGH-DRAFT)]

2005-03-17 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 17/03/05 00:49 -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 13:42 -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote: Well, look over AJS Kwid, and see what you think. The bullet syntax you give could work fine as a replacement for what I demonstrate, but I think everything else is pretty much 1:1. Now it's

Re: s/true/better name/

2005-03-17 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 17/03/05 04:40 +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:09:40PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: whereas as a native English speaker would probably expect $x = whether($a or $b); So I'm thinking we'll just go back to true, both for that reason, and because it does

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] A more extensible/flexible POD (ROUGH-DRAFT)]

2005-03-16 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 16/03/05 12:00 -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote: On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:48, Brian Ingerson wrote: Aaron, Upon reading this, it is unclear to me whether you have read about the Kwid format or you are simply guessing that Kwid is the same syntax used by Kwiki. I read the Kwid

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] A more extensible/flexible POD (ROUGH-DRAFT)]

2005-03-16 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 16/03/05 13:30 -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 12:25, David Storrs wrote: I quite like as the bracketing characters. They are visually distinctive, they connect well with their adjacent C/X/L/etc without visually merging into it (compare Lfoo with L[foo]), and in

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] A more extensible/flexible POD (ROUGH-DRAFT)]

2005-03-16 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 16/03/05 14:33 -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 14:17, Brian Ingerson wrote: Kwid does this by formally changing X... into {X...X} Ok, where is THAT proposal?! I'm reading the doc that's in doc/perlkwid.kwid in the pugs source tree. Hmmm... odd, I

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] A more extensible/flexible POD (ROUGH-DRAFT)]

2005-03-16 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 16/03/05 14:56 -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 14:24, Brian Ingerson wrote: vs Kwid: `$x $y` is about as *easy* as it gets in [Perl] Did you really read `perlkwid.kwid`? Yes, and can you please stop asking that question? I read it several times

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] A more extensible/flexible POD (ROUGH-DRAFT)]

2005-03-15 Thread Brian Ingerson
Aaron, Upon reading this, it is unclear to me whether you have read about the Kwid format or you are simply guessing that Kwid is the same syntax used by Kwiki. It is not the same format at all. Kwid is merely /inspired/ by Kwiki, which in turn is inspired by the (more usenix) features of modern

Config Variables

2005-03-03 Thread Brian Ingerson
Hi all, I'm hacking on pugs. I've added a Config.hs which is generated from the build system's perl's Config.pm. This allows me to expose the Perl6 magical variable $?OS. There are a lot of other config values that seem like they don't really need their own global. Things like 'privlib' and

Re: Config Variables

2005-03-03 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 03/03/05 11:25 -0800, Larry Wall wrote: On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 09:30:03AM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote: : Hi all, : : I'm hacking on pugs. I've added a Config.hs which is generated from the : build system's perl's Config.pm. This allows me to expose the Perl6 magical : variable $?OS

use only The::Finest = 1.23;

2003-02-19 Thread Brian Ingerson
versions of Perl don't support putting objects in @INC. AUTHOR Brian Ingerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] COPYRIGHT Copyright (c) 2003. Brian Ingerson. All rights reserved. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl

Re: In defense of zero-indexed arrays.

2002-12-06 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 05/12/02 02:45 -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote: I'm going to ask something that's probably going to launch off into a long, silly thread. But I'm really curious what the results will be so I'll ask it anyway. Think of it as an experiment. So here's your essay topic: Explain how having

utf and ebcdic

2002-11-04 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 04/11/02 12:12 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] aka Larry Wall wrote: If you want trigraph support, you'll have to put use encoding 'ugly-american'; at the top of your files. ;-) ;-) ;-) Otherwise, it'll be one-character ?fancyops? all the way. Mmm, I view one-character Unicode

Re: UTF-8 and Unicode FAQ, demos

2002-11-04 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 04/11/02 14:09 -0800, Austin Hastings wrote: --- Rafael Garcia-Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Austin Hastings wrote in perl.perl6.language : What we've got is an encoding problem at the MUA level. Mark Reed says my mailer (Yahoo!) tagged a message containing high-bit

Re: Supercomma! (was Re: UTF-8 and Unicode FAQ, demos)

2002-11-04 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 04/11/02 17:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Note to all: yes, this is me, despite the weirdities of the quoting and headers. This is how it looks when I using mutt out of the box, because I haven't yet customized it like I have pine. But I do like being able to see my own Unicode

Re: [RFC] Perl6 Operator List, Take 5

2002-10-30 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 30/10/02 15:33 -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote: On 2002-10-30 at 12:23:53, David Wheeler wrote: This tells me that Mail.app, for some reason, didn't know that it was supposed to use UTF-8 when showing Larry's mail. When I pasted his mail into a UTF-8 document in Emacs, it looked fine.

Re: [RFC] Perl6 Operator List, Take 5

2002-10-30 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 30/10/02 13:41 -0800, David Wheeler wrote: On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 01:35 PM, Graham Barr wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:25:44PM -0800, Austin Hastings wrote: --- Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do these French quotes come through? @a «+» @b Odd, I see

Re: Wh[ie]ther Infix Superposition ops

2002-10-29 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 29/10/02 09:58 -0800, Larry Wall wrote: On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: : On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:13:39AM +0200, Markus Laire wrote: So I would look favorably on finding a replacement for superposition. How about christmasgift or gift? You don't know what it is until

Re: Persistance of superpositions?

2002-10-29 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 30/10/02 08:36 +1100, Damian Conway wrote: Brian Ingerson wrote: Speaking of persistence, I just realized I'll need to start thinking about YAML serializations of superpositions. My first cut at it would be: --- letters: !super [0, 1, 2] digits: !super - 0

Fw: [Yaml-core] Summary of the IRC session

2002-09-06 Thread Brian Ingerson
This is an interesting tidbit from a longer posting by Oren Ben-Kiki, the YAML specification author. Thought I'd pass it on. - Forwarded message from Oren Ben-Kiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Oren Ben-Kiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 11:28:12 +0300 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]