On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote:
Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 9/7/10 08:17 , nore...@github.com wrote:
Commit: 7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8
http://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8
It was nicer
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Timothy S. Nelson wayl...@wayland.id.auwrote:
Hi. I'm wondering if any thought has been given to natural language
processing with Perl 6 grammars.
No specific tool is best suited for natural language processing. There was
apparently a time in which
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:10 AM, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: masak
Date: 2010-06-02 12:10:22 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31043
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] Buf does Stringy, too
-class Buf does
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:59 AM, nigelsande...@btconnect.com wrote:
This should be a reply to Daniel Ruoso's post above, but I cannot persuade
my nntp reader
to reply to a post made before I subscribed here. Sorry
And at the core of that, is the need for preemptive (kernel) threading and
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jonathan Worthington jonat...@jnthn.netwrote:
Though even clearer and same number of characters as whole_seconds is:
$dt.seconds.round
This makes more sense to me than the first example you listed because when
dealing with time measurement, I rarely think of
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Carl Mäsak cma...@gmail.com wrote:
You're using it wrong. You need to put 'trusts B;' in A in order for B to
see A's privates. I hope it is obvious why this is the case. -- Darren
Duncan
Aye, my mistake. Apparently the syntax I used to try to get at the
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Timothy S. Nelson
wayl...@wayland.id.auwrote:
There's a school of thought, common among printing/publishing types, that
insists that underline was intended solely to replace italics when they
couldn't be represented (i.e. no fonts, as with ASCII terminals and
://perl6advent.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/day-1-getting-rakudo/
Sorry about that empty reply.
-Jason Switzer
I was reading over S19 and had a few questions.
1) The colon delimiter (:name) is specified but no options are declared to
use it specifically. It's not clear why we would need this delimiter on top
of the other more popular delimiters. Are the long form (double dash), meta
syntax form (double
Since I don't know anything about nuclear power plants, I think the BikeShed
should be painted blue and called Rakudo Whatever or just Rakudo.
-Jason s1n Switzer
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;RSVP=TRUE
;CN=jason switzer;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:jswit...@gmail.com
CLASS:PRIVATE
CREATED:20090605T035151Z
DESCRIPTION:Hello All!divbr/divdivWe are planning on having another
Dallas.p6m meeting soon. span style=border-collapse
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;RSVP=TRUE
;CN=jason switzer;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:jswit...@gmail.com
CLASS:PRIVATE
CREATED:20090605T035151Z
DESCRIPTION:Hello All!divbr/divdivWe are planning on having another
Dallas.p6m meeting soon. span style=border-collapse
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Jon Lang datawea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Daniel Carrera
daniel.carr...@theingots.org wrote:
I think we might need to come up with some sort of standard naming
convention to distinguish dependencies. Something that the *user* can
I want to pose the same question for clarification that I asked #perl6:
S01 says that perl5 code will be supported via use v5. Can someone confirm
that embedded perl5 code is still required of any valid implementation? If
so, how will XS code be supported? Will the namespace between v5 code and
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:10 PM, James Fuller
james.fuller.2...@gmail.comwrote:
Is there any sponsorship money to spend on a very good graphic
designer to create something based on a small list of requirements as
to what meaning it should convey ?
I would agree; have a professional do it and
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 9:47 PM, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Added: docs/Perl6/Spec/S28-special-variables.pod
===
+=head2 Named variables (see S02):
+$?OS # operating system compiled for
+$*OS
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:51 PM, jerry gay jerry@gmail.com wrote:
$x == $y
:ok({ .true ?? 'message' !! 'failure message' })
:diag( 'tap comment', :some_tap_propertysome values)
I just want to stress again that I would like to see no focus on just tap
emitters. While I realize this
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote:
So Larry and Patrick developed the idea of creating an
adverb on the test operator instead:
$x == 1e5 :ok('the :ok makes this is a test');
This is an adverb on the infix:== operator, and might
desugar to something
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Jon Lang datawea...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, then. If I'm understanding this correctly, the problem being
raised has to do with deciding which language features to treat as
primitives and which ones to bootstrap from those primitives. The
difficulty is that
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:07 AM, jesse je...@fsck.com wrote:
'left' and 'right' are probably not the right names for functions which
trim leading and/or trailing space, since their meanings get somewhat
ambiguous if a language renders right-to-left instead of left-to-right
or vice-versa
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Larry Wall la...@wall.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:19:12PM -0800, Jon Lang wrote:
: As well, isn't there a way to escape a character that would otherwise
: be interpolated? If the intent were as you suppose, the original
: could be rewritten as:
:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Ovid
publiustemp-perl6langua...@yahoo.comwrote:
- Original Message
From: jason switzer jswit...@gmail.com
If we wanted language dependent version, use :leading, :trailing, and
:both.
That will require each implementation properly handle
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell ge...@broadwell.orgwrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:27 -0800, jerry gay wrote:
oh, yes, whoops! i responded to someone else in #pugs earlier, and
forgot to address the item here. Cperl6 --doc replaces p5's
Cperldoc (that's the latest idea
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Richard Hainsworth
rich...@rusrating.ruwrote:
a) I am fed up with writing something like
open(FP, ${fname}_out.txt) or die Cant open ${fname}_out.txt for
writing\n;
The complex definition of the filename is only to show that it has to be
restated
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Leon Timmermans faw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:42 PM, jason switzer jswit...@gmail.com wrote:
It's lazy and kinda cheating, but for small simple tasks, it gets the job
done. I'm not up to speed with the IO spec, but a sort of auto-slurp
It makes sense to me to go with option 1; you get what you ask for. It also
makes sense to make to not use magical implied numbers, such as negatives,
to accomplish things that either ranges or whatever star can accomplish.
Just my 2 cents.
-Jason s1n Switzer
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:27 AM,
26 matches
Mail list logo
