Re: [perl6/specs] 89cc32: Spec Bag.kxxv

2014-04-22 Thread Fields, Christopher J
On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Damian Conway wrote: >> It's an awesome language, which is exactly the problem. "Inspiring >> awe" is not far from inducing panic and terror, especially in people >> who aren't feeling too confident in the first place. We want to be >> accessible to the people who sta

Re: [perl6/specs] 89cc32: Spec Bag.kxxv

2014-04-22 Thread Damian Conway
> It's an awesome language, which is exactly the problem. "Inspiring > awe" is not far from inducing panic and terror, especially in people > who aren't feeling too confident in the first place. We want to be > accessible to the people who start looking nervous when the modulus > operator is added

Re: [perl6/specs] 89cc32: Spec Bag.kxxv

2014-04-22 Thread Parrot Raiser
>> 1. For the last few years almost all discussion is entirely on #perl6. > > Which seems to be working extremely well...just not for me. I can't > manage to track these discussions (even via the logs). I find the > interleaving of multiple threads utterly impossible to cope with. > Thank you for s

Re: PerlĀ 6 in CS (Was: [perl6/specs] 89cc32: Spec Bag.kxxv)

2014-04-22 Thread Smylers
Damian Conway writes: > I have no confidence yet, however, that Perl 6 will be widely taken up > as a CS teaching language. ... the decision on a teaching language > usually reflects either the personal biases of the individual teacher, > or those of the curriculum committee, or else mirrors the m

Re: [perl6/specs] 89cc32: Spec Bag.kxxv

2014-04-22 Thread Damian Conway
Raiph Mellor wrote: > The .kxxv method name is a placeholder. Phew! Thanks for taking the time to respond and explain, Raiph. > The brief discussion that motivated introducing it is at: > http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2014-04-13#i_8582049 > > Larry has chimed in at: > http://irclog.perlgeek.d

Re: [perl6/specs] 89cc32: Spec Bag.kxxv

2014-04-15 Thread David Green
On 2014-April-13, at 11:03 pm, Damian Conway wrote: >> Spec Bag.kxxv > It's a clever name...but maybe too clever? > I find it unfortunate that a method that only returns keys has a 'v'in its > name. > Up to now, we've had a more predictable pattern to naming these accessors. It could be called "

Re: [perl6/specs] 89cc32: Spec Bag.kxxv

2014-04-14 Thread raiph mellor
Hi Damian, The .kxxv method name is a placeholder. The brief discussion that motivated introducing it is at: http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2014-04-13#i_8582049 Larry has chimed in at: http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2014-04-14#i_8582684 --- Another discussion that's unfolding rig

Re: [perl6/specs] 89cc32: Spec Bag.kxxv

2014-04-13 Thread Damian Conway
> Spec Bag.kxxv It's a clever name...but maybe too clever? I find it unfortunate that a method that only returns keys has a 'v' in its name. Up to now, we've had a more predictable pattern to naming these accessors. How about one of: .weighted-keys .distribution instead??? And wha

[perl6/specs] 89cc32: Spec Bag.kxxv

2014-04-13 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs Commit: 89cc32d82d4f8cd49040ee56d54e04dbc04b65bc https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/89cc32d82d4f8cd49040ee56d54e04dbc04b65bc Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen Date: 2014-04-13 (Sun, 13 Apr 2014) Changed paths: