Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> I thought he was asking for evaluating until nothing is left to interpolate.
I wasn't, just some number of iterations of interpolation, but "infinite"
iterations of interpolation is an interesting idea, and could be added as a special
case... Such would make it hard to "es
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 11:38:57PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> I thought he was asking for evaluating until nothing is left to interpolate.
>
> Something akin to:
> $x = eval "$x" while $x =~ /[$@]/;
> But more intelligent.
OK, fair enough; and I appreciate the point that other double qu
> "SC" == Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SC> On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 05:56:36AM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
>> There is no way to turn obtain the value of $x from the value of $y.
>> In other words, while $foo and $bar were interpolated into $x, they
>> were not interp
Simon Cozens wrote:
> sub interpolate {eval "\"@_\""}
>
> Never say "there is no way". There's *always* a way, and 99% of the time it
> doesn't need to go in core.
Yes. Well, actually if you carefully read the thread about RFC 111 in which I got
the inspired flash that interpolation of variable
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 05:56:36AM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
> $foo = 'def';
> $bar = 'ghi';
> $x = "abc$foo$bar";
> $y = 'abc$foo$bar';
>
> There is no way to turn obtain the value of $x from the value of $y.
> In other words, while $foo and $bar were interp
