Timothy, you raise a good point that I had been thinking about earlier as a
consequence of my proposal about comments being preserved and attached as
meta-data to what is most appropriate contextually.
I'm thinking that it should be formally defined somewhere (maybe as an extra
section in the
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Darren Duncandar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
Timothy, you raise a good point...
[discussion]
I think this can be made to work without much fuss
I'm curious about these sorts of conversations, and the way the
community works in relation to them.
I'm also curious
Raiph Mellor raiph.mel...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyhoo, I'd love to see a session of brainstorming, with nitty gritty
detail, about possible ways to get what you guys and Mark and I and
perhaps others think we would like to see in the way of super tightly
woven together comments and code, where
Excellent idea. But may I suggest you perhaps might like to hold off
that discussion until next week?
@Larry had some very fruitful discussions about the long-overdue Pod
spec during YAPC::EU last week and, as a result, I plan to (finally!!!)
release a new version of S26 this week-end. I
Raiph Mellor raiph.mel...@gmail.com hyperpunned:
With this whiny man exchange ultimately having bourne supreme fruit,
the apocalypse watch for the post damian weekend begins...
ARRRG!
Damian ;-)
I had an interesting idea I wanted to put out there. If I'm being a
good boy and commenting my code, I do things like the following pseudocode:
# Get the stuff and do other stuff with it
@lines = slurp(file);
@otherlines = map { s/foo/bar/ } @lines
