[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jeremy Howard wrote:
>
> > So where is mv(), you ask? If you use the 'reorder' syntax, but don't
> > specify all of the dimensions in the list ref, then the remaining
dimensions
> > are added in order:
>
> That sounds good. I'd say why not also allow the mv syntax? It is
Karl Glazebrook:
> Well if a dimension has N elements then the numbering of the elements
> runs 0...N-1
>
> similarly if the shape has M dimensions, then the numbering of the
> dimensions is 0..M-1
>
> the arguments to reshape should be sizes not last elements (i.e. N's
> not N-1's).
>
> I think t
Jeremy Howard wrote:
> (I'm not assuming the no-flattening thing, since that's another source of
> angst altogether!)
What is the no-flattening thing?
Christian
Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> the arguments to reshape should be sizes not last elements (i.e. N's
> not N-1's).
Yup, it's simple: size (N) vs index range (0..N-1)
> How does this sound?
Logical and consistent ;)
Christian
Jeremy Howard wrote:
> So where is mv(), you ask? If you use the 'reorder' syntax, but don't
> specify all of the dimensions in the list ref, then the remaining dimensions
> are added in order:
That sounds good. I'd say why not also allow the mv syntax? It is
syntactically different from the oth
Jeremy Howard wrote:
>
> Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> > Jeremy Howard wrote:
> > >
> > > BTW, I notice that you're using dimension numbering starting at 0 for
> your
> > > transpose() examples. Is everyone happy to start at 0 rather than 1?
> >
> > OF COURSE!!!
Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> Jeremy Howard wrote:
> >
> > BTW, I notice that you're using dimension numbering starting at 0 for
your
> > transpose() examples. Is everyone happy to start at 0 rather than 1?
>
> OF COURSE!!
>
> anything else would be W
Jeremy Howard wrote:
>
> BTW, I notice that you're using dimension numbering starting at 0 for your
> transpose() examples. Is everyone happy to start at 0 rather than 1?
OF COURSE!!
anything else would be WRONG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about (if perl6 allows passing arrays implicitly by reference
> without arglist flattening)
>
> transpose @arr, $a, $b; # xchg
> transpose @arr, {$a => $b}; # mv
> transpose @arr, [0,3,4,1,2]; # PDL reorder
>
You know, I had just logged in to pos
Jeremy Howard wrote:
>
> Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> > you should look at the PDL mv() and xchg() methods
> > and factor this into your thinking!
> >
> Actually, the RFC is based on PDL's xchg()! I forgot to document using
> negative numbers to count from the last dimension--I'll add that into the
>
Jeremy Howard wrote:
>
> Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> > you should look at the PDL mv() and xchg() methods
> > and factor this into your thinking!
> >
> Actually, the RFC is based on PDL's xchg()! I forgot to document using
> negative numbers to count from the last dimension--I'll add that into the
Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> you should look at the PDL mv() and xchg() methods
> and factor this into your thinking!
>
Actually, the RFC is based on PDL's xchg()! I forgot to document using
negative numbers to count from the last dimension--I'll add that into the
next version. Are there any other dif
Jeremy:
you should look at the PDL mv() and xchg() methods
and factor this into your thinking!
Karl
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Arrays: transpose()
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Jeremy Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 22 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 272
Version: 1
Status: Developing
=head1 ABSTRACT
It
14 matches
Mail list logo
