* Jeff Stampes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-29 17:00]:
> Since I came to programming after the days of Forth and Lisp
> being prominent languages, I can't dispute nor concur with her
> statement. How would you respond?
By telling her that the comparison is flawed? Neither Lisp nor
Forth have anyt
Since I came to programming after the days of Forth and Lisp being
prominent languages, I can't dispute nor concur with her statement. How
would you respond?
First, a bit of advice that convinced me to go with Perl 6 not only
philosophically, but practically too.
Go here:
http://www.artlebedev
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:57:55AM -0600, Jeff Stampes wrote:
> I have one coworker known for her stubbornness. I've been hit with the
> following several times, and honestly don't have a good reply:
>
> "My bigger concern with the Perl6 syntax is that they expect humans to
> write it. This is a si
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:30:33AM -0700, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> I wanted to start working on a module (mainly to learn Perl 6, I doubt
> anyone would ever want to use it). I want to do this "properly," whatever
> that means. I was wondering if someone could explain to me:
>
> 1) How to constr
Jeff,
Greetings all. I've followed perl6 development since the beginning,
and have tried to stay at least somewhat informed along the way. I'll
confess to being puzzled at some of the design decisions, but knowing
my own limitations have had faith in @Larry to do the right thing.
This topi
Greetings all. I've followed perl6 development since the beginning, and
have tried to stay at least somewhat informed along the way. I'll
confess to being puzzled at some of the design decisions, but knowing my
own limitations have had faith in @Larry to do the right thing.
This topic woul
