Last day for FOSDEM submission

hello people, I just discovered this this morning: https://www.reddit.com/r/rakulang/comments/rrcp4c/steal_these_ideas_for_raku_fosdem_talks/ I don't remember if there was a previous annoucement in this list but it's still possible to jump in. I just submitted one on "Replacing Bash scripts

Re: about binary protocol porting

On 30.12.2021 06:41, Ralph Mellor wrote: On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 1:32 AM Jon Smart wrote: I plan to port a binary protocol client to perl6/raku. I have zero experience on this. Where should I get started? How well do you know programming, and Raku, and is the protocol a standard one you can

Re: Implementation of documented POD6 behaviour

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 12:18 PM Richard Hainsworth wrote: > > "In the future..." > > with a footnote that it is not implemented. > > I am willing to look at the Rakudo code and create a PR to > implement this functionality. Is there any reason not to do this I recommend you take into

Re: file format extensions

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 11:20 AM Richard Hainsworth wrote: > > It seems to me a short page in the docs.raku.org would > be useful with the various file extensions I'm +1 for this. I'm also +1 for recommending `.rakudoc` instead of `.pod6`. At least, for documentation files related to raku; what

Re: Implementation of documented POD6 behaviour

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 07:17 Richard Hainsworth wrote: > I plan to use the POD6 metadata functionality a lot in a new module. It > would be far better to separate out the meta data into lines. > Richard, there are many pod things that haven’t been implemented yet. I have planned for a long time

Re: file format extensions

rakudoc has been chosen as the official extension long ago. Best regards, Vadim Belman > On Dec 30, 2021, at 11:13 AM, Tom Browder wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 06:26 Elizabeth Mattijsen > wrote: > +1 from me. Shouldn't that be a .rakudoc file ? :-) > > Or

Re: file format extensions

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 06:26 Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > +1 from me. Shouldn't that be a .rakudoc file ? :-) Or .rakupod?

Re: file format extensions

+1 from me too. I'd also add test files to the list, which have at least .t and .rakutest (with the latter being preferred AFAK, so that GitHub will start highlighting them correctly). I'm not sure if there are other acceptable extensions for test files, though?

Re: file format extensions

I also agree that a page on docs would be helpful. But my point for this reply is about renaming POD6. I don't think this makes much sense and barely would ever happen. It is a legacy name, like NQP. Best regards, Vadim Belman > On Dec 30, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > >

Implementation of documented POD6 behaviour

I plan to use the POD6 metadata functionality a lot in a new module. It would be far better to separate out the meta data into lines. In https://docs.raku.org/language/pod I find "In the future, the configuration section may be extended over subsequent lines by starting those lines with an

Re: file format extensions

+1 from me. Shouldn't that be a .rakudoc file ? :-) > On 30 Dec 2021, at 12:20, Richard Hainsworth wrote: > > I'm revising how I name files that are included in my modules. With the name > change to Raku, the file extensions also changed for script and module files. > > In addition Jonathan

file format extensions

I'm revising how I name files that are included in my modules. With the name change to Raku, the file extensions also changed for script and module files. In addition Jonathan has defined some format extensions for Cro files, and I am sure there would be other developers who would like to