This report was a long time ago. Entirely possible that it's been resolved.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020, 2:58 PM William Michels wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:17 PM Aaron Sherman wrote:
> >
> > Here's four commands using my Math::Sequence module (note that the
> diff
4283461730174305227163324106696803630124570636862293503,
500000000
Yep, I'm pleased that Star is behind a bit. It needs to be the stable face
of Perl 6, but updated frequently enough that it's not irrelevant.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016, 12:51 PM Steve Mynott wrote:
> There are star releases every 3 months.
>
> There was a RC0 of 2016.10 released today.
>
> There is a
sking about). When you do everything in one
place, the result must have the ability to maintain and respond to global
state. There's really no other way around it. A pure BNF cannot parse
Python.
Aaron Sherman, M.:
P: 617-440-4332 Google Talk, Email and Google Plus: a...@ajs.com
Toolsmith,
e spec is actually written in Perl
6), the reality is that the parts that aren't written in Perl 6 can be
written in just about anything (with C/MoarVM and JVM implementations
working just fine).
It's not a context sensitive grammar that was the issue with Perl 5, it was
the lack of a spec
ch as a
parameter by inserting an empty block. You can see this documented and used
here:
http://examples.perl6.org/categories/parsers/SimpleStrings.html
Aaron Sherman, M.:
P: 617-440-4332 Google Talk, Email and Google Plus: a...@ajs.com
Toolsmith, developer, gamer and life-long student.
On Tue
presenting it as a region of memory isn't
really interesting. What you want to know about it are things that there
are other ways to calculate, such as its modulus by certain primes, its log
in various bases, etc.
Aaron Sherman, M.:
P: 617-440-4332 Google Talk, Email and Google Plus: a..
args: {@*ARGS.join(',')}";
Aaron Sherman, M.:
P: 617-440-4332 Google Talk, Email and Google Plus: a...@ajs.com
Toolsmith, developer, gamer and life-long student.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Joseph Garvin
wrote:
> Wait, quotes *are an operator* ? If so how would I define
>
> it is combining too many new things at once:
Well, it is meant to be the up-front example of everything at once before
the step-by-step...
> * BUILD
> * new
These are the heart of construction. I don't think there's any avoiding
that in a class tutorial.
* submethod
> * bless
These are
