A few people had started a port of some BioPerl code to Perl6 a while ago; I
tested this recently and it still passed tests.
https://github.com/cjfields/bioperl6
It should be renamed to bioraku!
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 3, 2020, at 11:41 AM, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 31, 2016, at 8:56 AM, Tom Browder
mailto:tom.brow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2016, Elizabeth Mattijsen
mailto:l...@dijkmat.nl>> wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2016, at 14:12, Tom Browder >
> wrote:
> Liz, it's a simple reader of a text file. The only line processing is a
> prin
Of course! the base URL has posts :P
http://www.learningperl6.com/
Knew I saw it somewhere...
Chris
On Mar 11, 2016, at 8:28 AM, Fields, Christopher J
mailto:cjfie...@illinois.edu>> wrote:
The below link indicates an update in Dec. 2015. I also recall seeing
something after the Chr
The below link indicates an update in Dec. 2015. I also recall seeing
something after the Christmas release, maybe from brian d foy, which indicated
this is still being worked on.
http://www.learningperl6.com/book/
Chris
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 7:56 AM, Will Coleda wrote:
>
> ISTR that link h
I had the same problem recently, tied to the revised path names (e.g. the
‘file#’ prefix). Any reason for the change? Kinda caught me by surprise.
chris
> On Jun 8, 2015, at 11:51 AM, mt1957 wrote:
>
> ls,
>
> Found another problem in the new rakudo (understood that was from 4/8).
> Versio
On Mar 31, 2015, at 6:28 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:40:44AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Rob Hoelz wrote:
>>> Yup, PERL6LIB. =)
>>
>> And how did you find out about it, i.e., where is it documented?
>
> http://doc.perl6.org/language
On Aug 9, 2014, at 8:51 PM, "Fields, Christopher J"
wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 9, 2014, at 5:25 PM, "t...@wakelift.de" wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 08/10/2014 12:21 AM, t...@wakelift.de wrote:
>>> Something that does surprise me is that your t
> On Aug 9, 2014, at 5:25 PM, "t...@wakelift.de" wrote:
>
>
>> On 08/10/2014 12:21 AM, t...@wakelift.de wrote:
>> Something that does surprise me is that your tests seem to imply that :p
>> for subparse doesn't work. I'll look into that, because I believe it
>> ought to be implemented already.
(accidentally sent to perl6-lang, apologies for cross-posting but this seems
more appropriate)
I have a fairly simple question regarding the feasibility of using grammars
with commonly used biological data formats.
My main question: if I wanted to parse() or subparse() vary large files (not
