On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Darren Duncan
wrote:
> On 2017-07-25 2:08 PM, Steve Mynott wrote:
>
>> To clarify Rakudo itself *should* compile on 32 bit Windows systems
>> (using either MSVC or mingw and maybe cygwin).
>>
>> The problem with Rakudo Star is that some of the C based modules
>> p
On 2017-07-25 2:08 PM, Steve Mynott wrote:
To clarify Rakudo itself *should* compile on 32 bit Windows systems
(using either MSVC or mingw and maybe cygwin).
The problem with Rakudo Star is that some of the C based modules
probably don't work.
So is it feasible to remove those modules from Rak
To clarify Rakudo itself *should* compile on 32 bit Windows systems
(using either MSVC or mingw and maybe cygwin).
The problem with Rakudo Star is that some of the C based modules
probably don't work.
S
On 25 July 2017 at 20:46, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Mark Car
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Mark Carter wrote:
> On 25/07/2017 20:31, Darren Duncan wrote:
>
>> I would question why any desktop computer manufacturers were still even
>> shipping non-64-bit capable hardware in 2010.
>>
> I dual-boot (rarely) with it, and it runs 64-bit Ubuntu. I am using a
On 25/07/2017 20:31, Darren Duncan wrote:
I would question why any desktop computer manufacturers were still
even shipping non-64-bit capable hardware in 2010.
I dual-boot (rarely) with it, and it runs 64-bit Ubuntu. I am using a
Dell, which came with 32-bit Win 7.
I would question why any desktop computer manufacturers were still even shipping
non-64-bit capable hardware in 2010.
Apple Macintoshes were 64 bit Intel across the board in 2006, or 11 years ago.
People like to accuse Apple of being constantly behind the curve on hardware
compared to other PC
On 2017-07-25 11:05 AM, Mark Carter wrote:
On 25/07/2017 18:34, Darren Duncan wrote:
How often would someone reasonably be using a cutting edge tool like Rakudo on
Windows without having a 64 bit Windows these days?
Thing is, I have a computer from 2010, Win 7 32-bit. It's fast enough for
