> On Nov 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Richard Tran Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Smith, Barry F. wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 12, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Satish Balay
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Richard Tran Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Smith, Barry F.
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 12, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Matthew Knepley
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Satish Balay
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 12 Nov 2017, Matthew Knepl
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Smith, Barry F. wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 12, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Satish Balay
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Nov 2017, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Have we tried histogramming test times? It would b
I'm switching the nightlybuild to next-tmp with the following branches for
tonight.
$ git fetch -p && comm -12 <(git branch -r --merged origin/next-tmp | sort)
<(git branch -r --no-merged origin/master | sort) |grep -v ' origin/next-tmp'
origin/barry/remove-petscdatatype-dmgetworkarray
orig
I've debugged into the ISGlobalToLocalMappingApplyBlock() function and
it seems to me the bounds checking in there is not correct when the
blocksize is > 1.
It checks against the same bounds, scaled up by the blocksize, in both
the block and non-block versions of the function. I think for the
In general PETSc will not work out of the box against newer versions of
external packages. If you do not need the new features of Sundials then just
use the default download of Sundials that PETSc uses automatically. If you need
the latest Sundials then someone needs to go through the process
On 11/15/2017 08:58 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> Do you have any idea what they changed the name of CVSpgmr to in 3.0?
>
> Matt
No, but release change-log
(https://computation.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/cvode) reports:
*Added generic SUNLINEARSOLVER module with eleven provided
implementatio
Do you have any idea what they changed the name of CVSpgmr to in 3.0?
Matt
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Antonio Trande
wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I can't build 'PETSc 3.8.*' with MPI against new 'Sundials-3.0.0':
>
>
> **
Hi,
I a seeing a bizarre behavior when setting up a DM for multiple fields.
In the attached example, if the call to PetscSectionSetNumFields is moved until
AFTER that to PetscSectionSetChart, I get an error while calling
PetscSectionSetDof.
Is this intended? If so, the documentation needs some