On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Richard Tran Mills <rtmi...@anl.gov> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Smith, Barry F. <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> > wrote: > >> >> >> > On Nov 12, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> >> wrote: >> > On Sun, 12 Nov 2017, Matthew Knepley wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > Have we tried histogramming test times? It would be nice to know how >> much >> > > cumulative >> > > time it takes to run 37%, 67%, 95%, etc. >> > >> > I'm not sure what 'histogramming test time' means. >> > >> > The below looked like cumulative times over all tests. I want the time >> for each test, and then >> > we bin them into say 10s wide bins and see which ones are taking the >> most time. >> >> WE FREAKING NEED TO CONVERT TO THE NEW TEST HARNESS TO DO THIS, then it >> is easy. >> >> So everyone, please, instead of spending twenty minutes a day sending >> and reading email about testing spend 20 minutes a day converting examples >> from the old tests to the new harness!!!!! >> > > For those of us who have no idea how to do this, could someone please give > me a pointer or two on where to look for an example or two or some > documentation? I should probably be spending a few minutes a day converting > some examples, but I don't know how or where to start. > There is a manual chapter on the test system, but for cut & paste semantics, you can look at SNES which has a lot of converted examples. Basically, you take each test entry from the makefile, and move it into the source file itself. Matt > --Richard > > >> >> > >> > Matt >> > >> > All logs record time. And Karl's script summarizes those times on the >> > dashboard. For eg: >> > >> > http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/nightlylogs/archive/2017/11 >> /11/maint.html >> > >> > If you want to do some analysis on those times - you can grab the >> > [historical] logs and run the required analysis. >> > >> > Satish >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their >> experiments lead. >> > -- Norbert Wiener >> > >> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ >> >> > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>