[petsc-dev] MatGetArrayF90()

2010-04-10 Thread Matthew Knepley
Why does this not match MatGetArray()? I know it looks good from MATDENSE, but shouldn't this be a special dense function? This is just annoying me since I want to pull this out without a stupid offset. Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is

[petsc-dev] MatGetArrayF90()

2010-04-10 Thread Barry Smith
Why don't you change it to MatDenseGetArrayF90() and make a new MatGetArrayF90() that does the 1d array? and why don't you start programming in C++, not stick with your favorite language Fortran :-) Barry On Apr 10, 2010, at 6:10 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: Why does this not