Sorry, If I call this AddBoundary Twice with different markers/ids, the
bcFunc seems to be applied to set values for DM_BC_ESSENTIAL not
DM_BC_NATURAL?
Can I callierr = PetscDSSetBdResidual(prob, 0, f0_bd_u, f1_bd_zero)
twice to set the f0 functions different for each boundary ?
/*@C
Hi,
Finally i used DMPlexCreateFromCellList, i don't know why i didn't try
it first. I indeed create hex cells (so far).
And it works !
Thanks for the help,
Yann
Le 20/11/2017 à 14:47, Matthew Knepley a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Yann Jobic
Randall Mackie writes:
> Dear PETSc team:
>
> On upgrading to version 3.8, we have discovered an inconsistency in the
> python configuration scripts for using Intel MKL for BLAS/LAPACK.
> It seems that these options were changed between 3.7 and 3.8:
>
>
> Version 3.8:
>
Thanks! will give that a try!
df
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:20 PM, David Fuentes
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the quick reply. Indeed it does work like this. I have added a
>> location dependence on
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:20 PM, David Fuentes wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply. Indeed it does work like this. I have added a
> location dependence on the boundary to differentiate the two. However, when
> my mesh moves then the BC will be applied incorrectly.
>
I
Thanks for the quick reply. Indeed it does work like this. I have added a
location dependence on the boundary to differentiate the two. However, when
my mesh moves then the BC will be applied incorrectly.
*// PetscFEIntegrateBdResidual_Basic DMPlexComputeBdResidual_Internal*
*static* *void**
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Randall Mackie wrote:
> Dear PETSc team:
>
> On upgrading to version 3.8, we have discovered an inconsistency in the
> python configuration scripts for using Intel MKL for BLAS/LAPACK.
> It seems that these options were changed between 3.7 and 3.8:
>
>
> Version 3.8:
>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:46 AM, David Fuentes wrote:
> *Is there a way to pass the boundary set id to the function pointers for
> the residual evaluation on the boundary ?*
>
>
*Is there a way to pass the boundary set id to the function pointers for
the residual evaluation on the boundary ?*
*https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/src/d89bd21cf2b5366df29efb6006298d2bc22fb509/src/dm/dt/interface/dtfe.c?at=master=file-view-default#dtfe.c-4245
Dear PETSc team:
On upgrading to version 3.8, we have discovered an inconsistency in the python
configuration scripts for using Intel MKL for BLAS/LAPACK.
It seems that these options were changed between 3.7 and 3.8:
Version 3.8:
--with-blaslapack-lib=libsunperf.a
--with-blas-lib=libblas.a
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Yann Jobic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to create my custom DMPLEX by using DMPlexCreateFromDAG(). I tried
> with only one cell. I have :
>
It looks like a hex cell. Here is how I order hex cells:
11 matches
Mail list logo