On 4/15/15 12:37 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
Hong and Emil,
You will need to answer this.
On Apr 15, 2015, at 6:24 AM, Dave Makhija wrote:
Barry,
Is the method exact if I have a time dependent mass matrix (dF/dU_t changes
each time step)? I'm not sure it's possible if TSSetIJacobian e
Hong and Emil,
You will need to answer this.
> On Apr 15, 2015, at 6:24 AM, Dave Makhija wrote:
>
> Barry,
>
> Is the method exact if I have a time dependent mass matrix (dF/dU_t changes
> each time step)? I'm not sure it's possible if TSSetIJacobian expects a
> function which comput
Barry,
Is the method exact if I have a time dependent mass matrix (dF/dU_t changes
each time step)? I'm not sure it's possible if TSSetIJacobian expects a
function which computes the combination of dF/dU and a*dF/dU_t. But,
perhaps there is something I'm missing.
Otherwise, it looks very comprehe
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:06 AM, Dave Makhija wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm evaluating my options for computing time dependent adjoints. I did not
> think PETSc supported this, but I see "TSAdjointSolve" in the development
> branch. That would be fantastic news if you plan to support time integrate
Hello,
I'm evaluating my options for computing time dependent adjoints. I did not
think PETSc supported this, but I see "TSAdjointSolve" in the development
branch. That would be fantastic news if you plan to support time integrated
adjoints!
What features are envisioned and when is the targeted r
