sers
mailto:petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov>>
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] FEM Implementation of NS with SUPG Stabilization
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 2:09 PM Brandon Denton
mailto:blden...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:
Thank you for the discussion.
Are we agreed then that the derivatives of
way. I
would much prefer that to
explicit inclusion of the basis.
Thanks,
Matt
> *From:* Matthew Knepley
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 11, 2023 3:13 PM
> *To:* Brandon Denton
> *Cc:* Jed Brown ; petsc-users
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] FEM Implementation of NS with SUPG
&g
parameter. I'd love to talk with you about this is more detail.
From: Matthew Knepley
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 3:13 PM
To: Brandon Denton
Cc: Jed Brown ; petsc-users
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] FEM Implementation of NS with SUPG Stabilization
--
> *From:* Jed Brown
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 11, 2023 1:38 PM
> *To:* Matthew Knepley
> *Cc:* Brandon Denton ; petsc-users <
> petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] FEM Implementation of NS with SUPG
> Stabilization
>
> Matthew
Knepley
Cc: Brandon Denton ; petsc-users
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] FEM Implementation of NS with SUPG Stabilization
Matthew Knepley writes:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 1:03 PM Jed Brown wrote:
>
>> I don't see an attachment, but his thesis used conservative variables and
>> de
Matthew Knepley writes:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 1:03 PM Jed Brown wrote:
>
>> I don't see an attachment, but his thesis used conservative variables and
>> defined an effective length scale in a way that seemed to assume constant
>> shape function gradients. I'm not aware of systematic
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 1:03 PM Jed Brown wrote:
> I don't see an attachment, but his thesis used conservative variables and
> defined an effective length scale in a way that seemed to assume constant
> shape function gradients. I'm not aware of systematic literature comparing
> the covariant
I don't see an attachment, but his thesis used conservative variables and
defined an effective length scale in a way that seemed to assume constant shape
function gradients. I'm not aware of systematic literature comparing the
covariant and contravariant length measures on anisotropic meshes,
I was thinking about trying to implement Ben Kirk's approach to Navier-Stokes
(see attached paper; Section 5). His approach uses these quantities to align
the orientation of the unstructured element/cell with the fluid velocity to
apply the stabilization/upwinding and to detect shocks.
If you
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 9:34 PM Brandon Denton via petsc-users <
petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Good Evening,
>
> I am looking to implement a form of Navier-Stokes with SUPG Stabilization
> and shock capturing using PETSc's FEM infrastructure. In this
> implementation, I need access to the
.
From: Jed Brown
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 10:18 PM
To: Brandon Denton ; petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] FEM Implementation of NS with SUPG Stabilization
Do you want to write a new code using only PETSc or would you be up for
collaborating on ceed-fluids, which is a high
Do you want to write a new code using only PETSc or would you be up for
collaborating on ceed-fluids, which is a high-performance compressible SUPG
solver based on DMPlex with good GPU support? It uses the metric to compute
covariant length for stabilization. We have YZƁ shock capturing, though
12 matches
Mail list logo