On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 11:55:37AM +0200, Marin Vidakovic wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody protect any oracle rdbms (sqlnet protocol) using
obsd 3.5 + carp + pfsync ? Does it work ? Is it problematic ?
Can you be more specific? Are you talking about 2 oracle rdbms + 2
Jeff Wilson wrote:
As I see it, my options are:
1.) invite the wrath of Frankenstein by attempting to use ifstated
within 3.5 -stable
You dont have to create a frankenstein tree for this.
Just get the ifstated files from current cvs and build on stable, it
builds just fine.
---
Lars
At 06:00 AM 6/16/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody protect any oracle rdbms (sqlnet protocol) using
obsd 3.5 + carp + pfsync ? Does it work ? Is it problematic ?
I assume you want to do a redundant DB correct? Databases are not suited
to this kind of failover, due to the lack of
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 02:28:26AM -0500, James Cammarata wrote:
At 06:00 AM 6/16/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody protect any oracle rdbms (sqlnet protocol) using
obsd 3.5 + carp + pfsync ? Does it work ? Is it problematic ?
I assume you want to do a redundant DB correct?
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Lars Hansson wrote:
You dont have to create a frankenstein tree for this. Just get the
ifstated files from current cvs and build on stable, it builds just
fine.
So let me see if I follow:
$ mkdir ~/ifstated cd ~/ifstated
$ CVSROOT=favorite_mirror cvs checkout
I'm trying to use pf with NAT for a home firewall, with a dialup ppp
connection to my ISP (and thence to the internet). Everything is fine
(apart from the insecurity) when I use a test NAT + pass-all-traffic
pf ruleset, but when I enable a proper NAT+filtering ruleset, all traffic
on the ppp link
I've been thinking about this as well. Perhaps one way to deal with the
master returning online is with ifstated: the backup could run a script
after a CARP change, tearing down the existing tunnel and allowing the
master firewall to establish a new IPSec tunnel.
Sean
Dave Mangot wrote:
We are
Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
[ massive snip ]
pf with a filtering ruleset
===
Now for the problem: For real use I've defined a pf ruleset which does
NAT and some filtering (and once I get things working I'll add additional
filtering rules for the Windows subnet):
# macros
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 02:28:26AM -0500, James Cammarata wrote:
At 06:00 AM 6/16/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody protect any oracle rdbms (sqlnet protocol) using
obsd 3.5 + carp + pfsync ? Does it work ? Is it problematic ?
I assume you want to do a
