Re: Newbie question.

2005-06-22 Thread Guðni Þór Björgvinsson
Bill Swisher wrote: After reading over the pf-faq.pdf file I have, at this time, one question. The home/small office example assumes that the internet lives off of ep0. In my case this is partially true. What really is there is a router running on the network 192.168.2.* (my internal

Re: Newbie question.

2005-06-22 Thread Jason Opperisano
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:23:49PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote: On Jun 21, 2005, at 6:24 PM, Bill Swisher wrote: After reading over the pf-faq.pdf file I have, at this time, one question. The home/small office example assumes that the internet lives off of ep0. In my case this is partially

PF State driving me nuts

2005-06-22 Thread Jaime Vargas
Hi all, I have a very simple setup. One soekris that is acting as firewall and router between two private networks. The rules are quite simple, and are suppose to only let the traffic for a few ports to past form the DMZ to the App Zones and vice-versa. I don't understand what I am doing

Re: PF State driving me nuts

2005-06-22 Thread j knight
Jaime Vargas wrote: pass out log all You probably want keep state on the pass out rule. The SYN/ACK reply from $app_net isn't being allowed in this ruleset. You can see that in your tcpdump capture below: 02:08:14.260021 rule 0/0(match): block in on sis1: 192.168.100.52.51011

Re: Newbie question.

2005-06-22 Thread Jason Dixon
On Jun 21, 2005, at 10:00 PM, Jason Opperisano wrote: priv_nets = { 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/12, 10.0.0.0/8, !192.168.2.0/24 } i'm certainly missing something here, as i am somewhat new-ish to pf (long time with ipf, though)... the above macro definition of priv_nets will

Re: Newbie question.

2005-06-22 Thread Kelley Reynolds
One thing to note on a semi-related topic is that when specifying subnets in tables, as of 3.7-RELEASE, subnets that weren't /24 (or probably /16 or /8) didn't work. I had a /22 subnet which didn't work where specifying the 4 class C's using /24 did. I mentioned it before but it was either

Re: Newbie question.

2005-06-22 Thread Nick Holland
Jason Dixon wrote: On Jun 21, 2005, at 6:24 PM, Bill Swisher wrote: After reading over the pf-faq.pdf file I have, at this time, one question. The home/small office example assumes that the internet lives off of ep0. In my case this is partially true. What really is there is a router

Re: PF State driving me nuts

2005-06-22 Thread Jon Hart
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:16:16PM -0400, Jaime Vargas wrote: Hi all, I have a very simple setup. One soekris that is acting as firewall and router between two private networks. The rules are quite simple, and are suppose to only let the traffic for a few ports to past form the DMZ to the

PF and multicast traffic

2005-06-22 Thread Michael W. Lucas
Hi, I have two FreeBSD 5.4-stable i386 boxes running PF in the typical failover configuration: one external interface, one internal, one sync. I also have softflowd running on the internal interface of both systems, to capture traffic flow information. About a week and a half ago, I started

[no subject]

2005-06-22 Thread musadu
US$22.Million Mission Musa mamadu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Friend, I am Mr.Musa mamadu, a merchant in Dubai, Arab Emirate. I have been diagnosed with Cancer which was discovered very late due to my laxity in caring for my health. It has defiled all forms of medicine. Right now I have only

pf bad state strange trouble

2005-06-22 Thread Andy
I recently occur strange message from PF on my OpenBSD 3.7 gate pf BAD state TCP ... ani IP address ps state failure on 2 | 5 gate work normally 5 months without this error , kernel generic What is mean and how to resolve it ?

Re: Newbie question.

2005-06-22 Thread Henning Brauer
* Kelley Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-22 15:24]: One thing to note on a semi-related topic is that when specifying subnets in tables, as of 3.7-RELEASE, subnets that weren't /24 (or probably /16 or /8) didn't work. I highly doubt that (and it is the first time I hear this)