Re: natting static IP's

2005-06-28 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 12:41, Sun 26 Jun 05, David Hill wrote: David Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: nat on sis0 inet from ! sis0:0 to any - (sis0) This sounds a bit too inclusive for my tastes. I assume the address range your DHCP deamon uses is known as well as the fixed addreses, so why not use those

Re: natting static IP's

2005-06-26 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
David Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: nat on sis0 inet from ! sis0:0 to any - (sis0) This sounds a bit too inclusive for my tastes. I assume the address range your DHCP deamon uses is known as well as the fixed addreses, so why not use those instead, ie myranges = { 192.168.100.0/24,

Re: natting static IP's

2005-06-26 Thread David Hill
David Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: nat on sis0 inet from ! sis0:0 to any - (sis0) This sounds a bit too inclusive for my tastes. I assume the address range your DHCP deamon uses is known as well as the fixed addreses, so why not use those instead, ie myranges = { 192.168.100.0/24,

natting static IP's

2005-06-25 Thread David Hill
Hello I once used software by Cisco called BBSM. It nat'd both DHCP'd clients, as well as clients that already had static IP's in place. I am trying to copy this onto the OpenBSD platform. Would the following work? I have sis0 (ethernet) and ath0 (wireless). sis0 has a public IP address.