Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 2 patches

2013-05-06 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2013/4/29 Dave Page > Hi > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > thank you for committing. > > > > Attached are two "bug fixes" and an improvement. > > > > - Can not save settings if th

[pgadmin-hackers] 2 patches

2013-04-27 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, for personal use I've made some modifications to pgadmin. Two thnings that are very frustrating when you need to copy results to spreadsheets. 1. Decimal mark Added an option to change default decimal mark to something other. 2. Result grid: Copy column names Added option to include column na

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Website

2011-07-19 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/7/19 Dave Page > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > > > > > I suggested a small refresh of the page, therefore I made just small > changes > > so the page looks polished. I didn't promised a big change. > > No, I re

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Website

2011-07-19 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/7/19 Dave Page > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: > > > > Still not convinced. I prefer the orange than the red. But, actually, I > > don't really see how this design is any better than the old one. Not > > that I really like the old one, but I don't see what the

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Website

2011-07-18 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
OK, my dear twins ;) I've excepted an similar answer from you Dave, so I changed the design based on Guillaume's suggestions. 2011/7/18 Dave Page > On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > > >> I don't really like it. Sure, it d

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Website

2011-07-17 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/7/17 Guillaume Lelarge > On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 12:50 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > > > > > > 2011/7/17 Dave Page > > On Saturday, July 16, 2011, Guillaume Lelarge > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 22:53 +0200,

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Website

2011-07-17 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/7/17 Dave Page > On Saturday, July 16, 2011, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 22:53 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> after 5 years it would be good to update the pgadmin.org website. The > >&g

[pgadmin-hackers] Website

2011-07-16 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, after 5 years it would be good to update the pgadmin.org website. The design isn't modern any more. I've got some ideas, may I try it? Jasmin

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Email notification pgAgent

2011-07-15 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/7/15 Dave Page > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Well...it took a long time, but the feature is done :) > > A friend of mine wrote a C implementation of an smtp client and gave it > to > > me to include it into pgAgent. > &

Re: Fwd: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-07-05 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Great that it's done. Thank you for beautification. 2011/7/5 Guillaume Lelarge > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 20:42 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 21:33 +0200, Jasmin

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [FEATURE] Add schema option to all relevant objects

2011-07-05 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
ing search object I've done some improvements to this methods, so you should maybe wait for Guillaume committing my patch. 2011/7/5 Thom Brown > On 5 July 2011 21:14, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > >> > > Did you fix the issue with the refresh of the browser? (I can'

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [FEATURE] Add schema option to all relevant objects

2011-07-05 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/7/5 Guillaume Lelarge > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 21:01 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: > > On 5 July 2011 20:47, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > > Hi Thom, > > > > > > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 20:23 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: > > >> [...] > > >> I noticed that objects which can be moved to different schemas

Re: Fwd: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-07-05 Thread jasmin . dizdarevic
Are you siamese twins? :) --Originalnachricht-- Von: Dave Page An:jasmin.dizdare...@gmail.com Cc:Guillaume Lelarge Cc:pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Betreff: Re: Re: Fwd: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects Gesendet: 5. Jul. 2011 22:00 On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:54 PM, wrote: > I

Re: Fwd: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-07-05 Thread jasmin . dizdarevic
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 20:42 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 21:33 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > >> Sure. > >> > > > > Thanks. I'm almost done, and ready to apply :) &g

Re: Fwd: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-07-04 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/7/4 Guillaume Lelarge > On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 09:10 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 23:39 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > > > Could somebody review the patch and maybe commit it? > > > > > > > I'll look in

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Replication references

2011-06-26 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, I thought it should be "Slony Replication" in the tree, but the latest master-build show's: "Replication"? Am I doing wrong, or is this wanted? 2011/6/26 Magnus Hagander > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 19:52, Dave Page wrote: > > On Sunday, June 26, 2011, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> On Fri,

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-06-16 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 23:51 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > > > > > > I suppose you're talking about "git rebase". Do a "git > > rebase -i" to get > >

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-06-16 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/6/16 Guillaume Lelarge > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:48 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > > Yeah, I know. All of the dialogs have a "binding" to some pgObject, > > because all of them modifies something. > > No, see dlgFindAndReplace. > > > When I star

[pgadmin-hackers] Fwd: Foreign Table without options

2011-06-16 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
here's the patch. -- Forwarded message -- From: Jasmin Dizdarevic Date: 2011/6/16 Subject: Foreign Table without options To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org There is a Problem in "void pgForeignTable::iSetOptions(const wxString &tmpoptions)" when tmpoptions i

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wrong sql code for fk covering index

2011-06-16 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, this patch should fix that. regards, Jasmin 2011/6/16 Timon > When trying to create covering index for existing fk constrain by > checking checkbox in dialog, pgadmin 1.14 (latest git) generates wrong > code for postgresql 9.0. > > ALTER TABLE hotels VALIDATE CONSTRAINT hotels_city_id_fkey

[pgadmin-hackers] Foreign Table without options

2011-06-15 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
There is a Problem in "void pgForeignTable::iSetOptions(const wxString &tmpoptions)" when tmpoptions is empty (no options specified during creation of FT) we're running into an infinite loop. I would like to provide a patch, but currently I've some troubles with my local branches ;) Could somebod

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-06-15 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011-06-15 at 08:08 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 01:03 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > please take another look on it. The UI should work correctly now. > > > > > > > > > Lin

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Branch 1.14?

2011-06-15 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/6/15 Guillaume Lelarge > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:00 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > > You're right. Patching very old releases will become more difficult. > > But those patches are rare and most of the time not very large, so the > > merge should not be a big p

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Branch 1.14?

2011-06-15 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
You're right. Patching very old releases will become more difficult. But those patches are rare and most of the time not very large, so the merge should not be a big problem. Either one actual version of pgAdmin which supports everything back to 7.3. or different versions which targets different po

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Branch 1.14?

2011-06-14 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
currently there are 10 versions of pgadmin for download ( http://pgadmin.org/download/windows.php) available, which works with older versions. if someone likes to manage an older version he can download an older client. there are no tests of current releases against older versions of postgresql, so

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Branch 1.14?

2011-06-14 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
:-p > > Seriously though, no, we don't support 7.3 - iirc we agreed to drop > that a few years back. I'm fine with un-supporting 8.0 and 8.1 too. > > On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Let's play jeopardy: > > Is 7.3 really the

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Branch 1.14?

2011-06-14 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
s, I think so. > > On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > =) > > BTW: > > [...]The application may be used on Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, Mac OSX and > Windows platforms to manage PostgreSQL 7.3 and above running on any > platform[...] > > >

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Branch 1.14?

2011-06-14 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
nimum version supported/patched by PostgreSQL (currently 8.2.21)? 2011/6/14 Guillaume Lelarge > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:00 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 14, 2011, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 20:57 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic w

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Branch 1.14?

2011-06-14 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Excuse me? *g* 2011/6/14 Guillaume Lelarge > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > > >> wrote:

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-06-11 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
send you the solution file. linux users will hopefully know, what they have to do ;-) thanks jasmin 2011/6/7 Guillaume Lelarge > On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 21:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-06-07 at

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-06-07 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
that's exactly what I'm looking for :) thank you! 2011/6/7 Guillaume Lelarge > On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 21:58 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > > I know...these are the strings that has to be translated. As I know in > > pgAdmin there are language files, which are define

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-06-07 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
language. My question is: How to translate a string manually. 2011/6/7 Guillaume Lelarge > On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 19:30 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > > In the search result list I've to build a node path. the problem is, > > that node paths are language dependent. &g

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-06-07 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
In the search result list I've to build a node path. the problem is, that node paths are language dependent. how can i manually translate "Server Groups/Servers/local.db/Databases/..." to "Servergruppen/Server/local.db/Datenbanken" (german) in an elegant way? 2

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-06-01 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Alright, I'm going to change the query. 2011/6/1 Guillaume Lelarge > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 10:05 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > > Can we use the pg_catalog? > > > > pgAdmin works only by querying the PostgreSQL catalog. > > > -- > Guillaume > h

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Discussion - Search Objects

2011-06-01 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Can we use the pg_catalog? 2011/6/1 Dave Page > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: > > > > One is allowed to drop the information_schema system catalog? I didn't > > know that. I guess it's all right 'cause you don't really need it. > > I'm surprised you didn't know tha

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Help with dlg

2011-05-28 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Thanks! I've forgotten to implement frmSearchObject::OnChange() in frmSearchObject.cpp. 2011/5/28 Dave Page > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to work on this item "Ability to search a database for objects >

[pgadmin-hackers] Help with dlg

2011-05-28 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, I'd like to work on this item "Ability to search a database for objects with a specific name.". I've took frmReport.cpp as template for the Search Object UI. I've created frm/frmSearchObject.cpp include/frm/frmSearchObject.h ui/frmSearchObject.xrc added #include "frm/frmSearchObject.h" to incl

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] PATCH: Using wxDatePickerCtrl instead of wxCalendarBox

2011-05-27 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Very sexy on Windows 7. 2011/5/27 Ashesh Vashi > Hi Dave, > > For some reason, the wxCalendarBox control was not working on linux (i.e. > Ubuntu). > I found that - wxWidgets has already provided a class for that. > (wxDatePickerCtrl). > > http://docs.wxwidgets.org/stable/wx_wxdatepickerctrl.html

[pgadmin-hackers] FWD Handler with 9.0

2011-05-27 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
With 1.14 Beta 1 when connecting to 9.0 and enabling FWD in browser a error message appears: Column fwdhandler not found or similar. 0001-Fix-error-message-because-of-missing-pg_foreign_data.patch Description: Binary data -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, the problem is the command-line definition for png2c in pgadmin3.props. when line 14 looks like that, the build works. "$(SolutionDir)xtra\png2c\$(Configuration)\png2c.exe" [AllOptions] [AdditionalOptions] "%(FullPath)" "%(FullPath)c" there is also a build-wxmsw attached that works with vs

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Build without WXUSINGDLL

2011-01-12 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
libraries missing, that should be linked into the assembly. 2011/1/12 Dave Page > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > I see, how to build pgadmin the release way? > > Because, when I build now, it requires that the *vc_custom.dll is present > on

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Build without WXUSINGDLL

2011-01-12 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
I see, how to build pgadmin the release way? Because, when I build now, it requires that the *vc_custom.dll is present on the system. When installing pgAdmin, this is not required. 2011/1/12 Dave Page > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Hi, >

[pgadmin-hackers] Build without WXUSINGDLL

2011-01-12 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, I'm currently trying to build pgAdmin without the DLL flag. The build fails with "cannot find 'wxbase28_vc_custom.lib'". The corresponding dll is present in the wxWidgets\lib\vc_dll folder and the build with DLL flag works. What this library means and where to get or how to compile it? Thank

Fwd: [pgadmin-hackers] Info on non supported Features

2011-01-10 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
-- Forwarded message -- From: Jasmin Dizdarevic Date: 2011/1/10 Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Info on non supported Features To: Guillaume Lelarge Hi, you will need this two patches - i hope it works. I'm interested, how you would take a look on a branch of mine. This

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New options dialog

2011-01-10 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Such setting dialogs are state of the art now and it's a good investment in future, when more and more settings are required. 2011/1/10 Dave Page > Hi > > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > At pgday.eu 2010, Dave and I discussed about the options dialog.

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Info on non supported Features

2011-01-10 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/1/10 Guillaume Lelarge > Le 10/01/2011 11:07, Jasmin Dizdarevic a écrit : > > Sure, it's possible, but then you have take care of each control > > individually. Setting a text in a combobx and checkbox is quiet > different. > > I think this change is acceptable,

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Info on non supported Features

2011-01-10 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
1/2011 10:53, Dave Page a écrit : > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > > wrote: > >> Hi Guys, > >> as I started working on email notification Dave told me, that I've to > >> disable all email notification relevant GUI elements, if the

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Another fix on my "unlogged table" patch

2011-01-09 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Great, now everything seems to be ok. 2011/1/9 Guillaume Lelarge > Another fix on my "unlogged table" patch > > Report from Jasmin Dizdarevic. > > Branch > -- > master > > Details > --- > > http://git.postg

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Fix the enableing of Unlogged checkbox

2011-01-09 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, sorry, but there is still a bug: When I click on a table the following statement is shown in the SQL pane: CREATE UNLOGGED TABLE berfil.tasks ( taskid character varying(32) NOT NULL, taskyear numeric(4,0), and when opening properties the checkbox is checked. Backend is 8.4. Just anothe

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Debug works, Release not

2011-01-07 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
2011/1/7 Dave Page > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Hi, > > here is the patch, that enables UI for pgAgent 4. > > Cool! > > > It would be great if somebody could try to build in Release mode. > > The UI should work with pg

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Optional Exporting or copying result with (,) as decimal mark

2011-01-07 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
s to be an optional parameter or a session based setting. But that's a topic for an other mailing list ;) I know my patch is just a workaround, but it saves us a lot of time in this particular process. 2011/1/7 Dave Page > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: >

[SOLVED] Fwd: [pgadmin-hackers] Debug works, Release not

2011-01-06 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Nobody said me, that Release uses compiled .xrc-Files and Debug doesn't? :p embed-xrc.bat was the solution. Jasmin -- Forwarded message -- From: Jasmin Dizdarevic Date: 2011/1/6 Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Debug works, Release not To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org

[pgadmin-hackers] Optional Exporting or copying result with (,) as decimal mark

2011-01-06 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, in pgsql it's not possible to define, that numeric values are returned in localized numeric format. In our case (Austria) we use comma as decimal mark and not period. When opening a pgadmin-exported CSV-File, we have troubles in Excel, because it doesn't recognize numeric values properly. We w

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Support for unlogged tables

2011-01-06 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, I've just build the latest master branch. I think there is a problem with the unlogged feature. pgAdmin crashes on pgsql 8.4. The problem (access violation) occurs on line 1224: *if (chkUnlogged->GetValue())* sql += wxT("UNLOGGED ") Regards, Jasmin 2011/1/1 Guillaume Lelarge > Le 31/12/

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Debug works, Release not

2011-01-06 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
, you can apply attached pgagent_upgrade.sql. Thanks & Regards, Jasmin 2011/1/5 Jasmin Dizdarevic > This could be an issue, but the problem occurs at the pointer to the > combobox. If I debug it (in Release) I'm getting the exception when trying > to step in AppendItem-Method. S

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords dynamically from PostgreSQL headers

2011-01-06 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
ned on and off, or is it supposed to always be installed? > (question directed at the installer guys, not you Jasmin! :P) > > //Magnus > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 18:19, Jasmin Dizdarevic < > jasmin.dizdare...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> -- Fo

Fwd: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords dynamically from PostgreSQL headers

2011-01-06 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
-- Forwarded message -- From: Jasmin Dizdarevic Date: 2011/1/6 Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords dynamically from PostgreSQL headers To: Ashesh Vashi OK, I've noticed now, that the file is only included in the linux binaries version. Mayb

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords dynamically from PostgreSQL headers

2011-01-06 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
A: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com> > > > > *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi> > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic < > jasmin.dizdare...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> unpac

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords dynamically from PostgreSQL headers

2011-01-06 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
*http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi> > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic < > jasmin.dizdare...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> the directory is there, but no gram.h. >> >> 2011/1/6 Ashesh Vashi >

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords dynamically from PostgreSQL headers

2011-01-06 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, since this patch is applied, i can't build pgAdmin. %pgdir%\include\server\parser doesn't contain a gram.h file. What I'm doing wrong? Ty Jasmin 2011/1/5 Magnus Hagander > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 06:05, Ashesh Vashi > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Debug works, Release not

2011-01-05 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
ng-NULL thing? > > //Magnus > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:23, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Yes, I have. Maybe the problem is VS 2010, however it's very strange. > > > > 2011/1/5 Dave Page > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Jasmin Di

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Debug works, Release not

2011-01-05 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Yes, I have. Maybe the problem is VS 2010, however it's very strange. 2011/1/5 Dave Page > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Hi, > > have you ever had the problem, that a Debug build works on windows and > the > > Release does n

[pgadmin-hackers] Debug works, Release not

2011-01-05 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, have you ever had the problem, that a Debug build works on windows and the Release does not? The problem is an access violation during appending items to a combobox. I tried to disable optimization, without success. It's difficult to provide a patch now, because the changes are not small. Her

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Step ordering pgAgent

2011-01-04 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
e database "clean" or to update data (data cumulation, definition updates,...). But we can discuss this topic later, if it's requested by more users. Jasmin 2011/1/3 Dave Page > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Why is the tri

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Step ordering pgAgent

2011-01-03 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
isn't used on much installations? . 2010/12/31 Magnus Hagander > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 15:38, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm starting another thread for this topic. You'll find the last comment > > from Dave at the bottom. > >> 1. S

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Email notification pgAgent

2010-12-31 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
t via Exec in pgAgent. Is this a practicable way for you? Jasmin 2010/12/31 Dave Page > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I'm not so keen on that - it could require some funky code to ensure > > that the user use

[pgadmin-hackers] Step ordering pgAgent

2010-12-31 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, I'm starting another thread for this topic. You'll find the last comment from Dave at the bottom. > 1. Step ordering > I suggest adding a column named "jstorder" to pgagent.pga_jobsteps, so > we don't have to rename the steps "A_", "B_" if an ordering is required. In > the GUI we would add

Fwd: [pgadmin-hackers] Email notification pgAgent

2010-12-29 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
-- Forwarded message -- From: Jasmin Dizdarevic Date: 2010/12/29 Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Email notification pgAgent To: Dave Page Hi, * * *I'm not so keen on that - it could require some funky code to ensure* *that the user uses sequential (or at least, non-dupl

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Email notification pgAgent

2010-12-29 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
ld would be treated as a path to a file, which contains SQL-Statements. Please let me know what you (all of you) think about the suggested features. Regards, Jasmin 2010/12/29 Dave Page > Hi > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Okay, I'm a

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Email notification pgAgent

2010-12-27 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
characters are wrong, 254 is the maximum. I didn't knew that "text" in this case is more efficient than "varchar(n)". Jasmin 2010/12/27 Dave Page > Hi > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > P3 is a goo

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Email notification pgAgent

2010-12-27 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
10/12/27 Dave Page > Hi > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic > wrote: > > Hi, > > we've just decided to use pgAgent in our company, so I set it up and > > discovered that there is no email notification support on failures. > > I've

[pgadmin-hackers] Email notification pgAgent

2010-12-26 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, we've just decided to use pgAgent in our company, so I set it up and discovered that there is no email notification support on failures. I've decided to add this functionality, but I have some questions: 1. Have there been any plans to add mail notification in the past? 2. Is the feature desi