Le 24/03/2011 11:21, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm looking at adding user mapping support. My first idea was to add
>> them as children of foreign servers, but it doesn't seem this was a
>> really good idea. They have no OIDs, n
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at adding user mapping support. My first idea was to add
> them as children of foreign servers, but it doesn't seem this was a
> really good idea. They have no OIDs, no owners, no comments... geez, no
> nothing actual
Le 23/03/2011 23:39, Thom Brown a écrit :
> On 23 March 2011 22:10, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm looking at adding user mapping support. My first idea was to add
>> them as children of foreign servers, but it doesn't seem this was a
>> really good idea. They have no OIDs, no owners, n
On 23 March 2011 22:10, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at adding user mapping support. My first idea was to add
> them as children of foreign servers, but it doesn't seem this was a
> really good idea. They have no OIDs, no owners, no comments... geez, no
> nothing actually. They d
Hi,
I'm looking at adding user mapping support. My first idea was to add
them as children of foreign servers, but it doesn't seem this was a
really good idea. They have no OIDs, no owners, no comments... geez, no
nothing actually. They don't seem like objects, meaning they can't be in
their own no
