Re: [ADMIN] License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose

2004-03-28 Thread Peter Galbavy
Tom Lane wrote: > Neither of those readings is correct. The correct interpretation is > that the copyright holders (us and UCB, in the case of Postgres) > aren't charging any fee. This does not prohibit others from charging > for their own efforts. As I said in my original reply, intention has l

Re: [ADMIN] md5 is invalid?

2004-03-28 Thread Tom Lane
Robert C Paulsen Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I added a line to pg_hba.conf: > hostall 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 md5 You're a field short ... apparently you are reading pre-7.4 documentation about the format of pg_hba.conf. It's unhappy because "md5" doesn't look like a

[ADMIN] md5 is invalid?

2004-03-28 Thread Robert C Paulsen Jr
I am trying to setup postgresql 7.4.2 on Red Hat Enterprise ver 3.0. I installed every rpm from the download directory: $ rpm -qa | grep postgres postgresql-docs-7.4.2-1PGDG postgresql-contrib-7.4.2-1PGDG postgresql-test-7.4.2-1PGDG postgresql-libs-7.4.2-1

Re: [ADMIN] License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose

2004-03-28 Thread Tom Lane
"Peter Galbavy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You should get your local legal professional to give an opinion if you > intend to redistribute. One specific area of contention amongst "BSD > license" people is the phrase: > "... for any purpose, without fee, and ..." > Some opine that this means the

Re: [ADMIN] postgresql.conf file and logging questions

2004-03-28 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > 1. Where should the postgresql.conf file be to be recognized by the > service on startup? currently, it is inside my $PGDATA directory but > all of its contents are commented out. That's the correct file. Uncomment anything you want to change. > 2. I can't find a

Re: [ADMIN] License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose

2004-03-28 Thread Peter Galbavy
Eric Yum wrote: > http://www.postgresql.org/licence.html You should get your local legal professional to give an opinion if you intend to redistribute. One specific area of contention amongst "BSD license" people is the phrase: "... for any purpose, without fee, and ..." Some opine that this mea