On 7 May 2013 03:54, Uwe Schroeder wrote:
> On Mon, 05/06/2013 05:51:00 PM Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Misa Simic wrote:
> > > But, IMO it is something totally irrelevant now-days... With today
> > > tools...
> > > I understand why such thing has been important 20-30
Kamil Jońca wrote:
> PS. does news.postgresql.org work? I got 'unknown host'
Not anymore.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes t
2013/5/7 Kamil Jońca :
>
> I tried to create make backup my postrgresql cluster with amanda.
> And I had to create database superuser.
>
> I tried to create no-superuser role with only "replication" privillege,
> but after run backup I got:
>
> --8<---cut here---start---
I tried to create make backup my postrgresql cluster with amanda.
And I had to create database superuser.
I tried to create no-superuser role with only "replication" privillege,
but after run backup I got:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
2013-05-06 13:33:02 CES
On Mon, 05/06/2013 05:51:00 PM Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Misa Simic wrote:
> > But, IMO it is something totally irrelevant now-days... With today
> > tools...
> > I understand why such thing has been important 20-30 years ago (in
> > previous
> > century)
>
> You're a
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Misa Simic
> >
> wrote:
>
> > But, IMO it is something totally irrelevant now-days... With today
> tools...
> > I understand why such thing has been important 20-30 years ago (in
> previous
> > century)
>
> You're ass
On 07/05/13 04:15, Craig James wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, I see comments like this all the time:
>
>> (*please* stop top-posting).
So people can...
> I've been participating in newsgroups since UUCP days, and I've never
> encountered a group before that encouraged bottom posting. Bottom
>
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Misa Simic wrote:
> But, IMO it is something totally irrelevant now-days... With today tools...
> I understand why such thing has been important 20-30 years ago (in previous
> century)
You're assuming we all use the same tools. There are still people on
this who (
On Monday, May 6, 2013, Craig James wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, I see comments like this all the time:
>
> > (*please* stop top-posting).
>
> I've been participating in newsgroups since UUCP days, and I've never
> encountered a group before that encouraged bottom posting. Bottom posting
> ha
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> I personally don't really care, but what I really find annoying are bottom
> posters
> that do not trim the quoted message - especially if the original message was
> quite long.
Especially if there are dozens of untrimmed quotes above THAT.
Regarding top posting versus bottom posting, pretty almost everyone who has
commented agrees that top versus bottom posting isn't the problem. It's
laziness about editing, perhaps exacerbated by certain email systems that
encourage that laziness.
So how about this: instead of demanding "PLEASE DO
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:20:30PM +0200, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> With a newsreader that show threads instead of individual messages it's easier
> to read a top-post answer because you don't need to scroll down.
it is important to note that people use a variety of tools to read
mailing lists, new
Szymon Guz, 06.05.2013 20:25:
That's strange. I've never met any newsgroup which would require top
posting. Top posting has always been considered rude.
We are reading from top to bottom. That's why people should answer
below cited text, so we can read it later normally. I mean that I
should re
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:55:41AM -0700, Craig James wrote:
> My real gripe is with laziness, not bottom posting. Anyone who can't spend a
> minute to edit quoted material to the relevant part is forcing thousands of
> readers to wade through irrelevant crap. It's inconsiderate.
How about sente
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Szymon Guz wrote:
> On 6 May 2013 20:15, Craig James wrote:
>
>> Just out of curiousity, I see comments like this all the time:
>>
>> > (*please* stop top-posting).
>>
>
> We are reading from top to bottom. That's why people should answer below
> cited text, so w
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 08:25:25PM +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
> That's strange. I've never met any newsgroup which would require top
> posting. Top posting has always been considered rude.
>
> We are reading from top to bottom. That's why people should answer below
> cited text, so we can read it la
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 08:25:25PM +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
> We are reading from top to bottom. That's why people should answer below cited
> text, so we can read it later normally. I mean that I should read first the
> part of email you answer to, and than below your answer.
>
> http://www.idall
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:15:09AM -0700, Craig James wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, I see comments like this all the time:
>
> > (*please* stop top-posting).
top posting is just lazy.
bottom posting, equally so.
one should be replying in-line, with context, and removing extraneous content.
Craig James writes:
> I've been participating in newsgroups since UUCP days, and I've never
> encountered a group before that encouraged bottom posting. Bottom posting
> has traditionally been considered rude -- it forces readers to scroll,
> often through pages and pages of text, to see a few li
> Just out of curiousity, I see comments like this all the time:
>
>> (*please* stop top-posting).
>
> I've been participating in newsgroups since UUCP days, and I've never
> encountered a group before that encouraged bottom posting. Bottom posting
> has traditionally been considered rude -- it
Craig James wrote:
> Contributors in these newsgroups seem to think it's OK to quote five pages
> of someone else's response, then add one or two sentences at the bottom ...
> it's just laziness that forces readers to wade through the same stuff over
> and over in each thread.
>
> How did the Pos
On 6 May 2013 20:15, Craig James wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, I see comments like this all the time:
>
> > (*please* stop top-posting).
>
> I've been participating in newsgroups since UUCP days, and I've never
> encountered a group before that encouraged bottom posting. Bottom posting
> has
Just out of curiousity, I see comments like this all the time:
> (*please* stop top-posting).
I've been participating in newsgroups since UUCP days, and I've never
encountered a group before that encouraged bottom posting. Bottom posting
has traditionally been considered rude -- it forces reader
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Rodrigo Barboza
> wrote:
> > Hi, guys.
> > Postgres doc says it is better to place the pgstat.stat file in ram disk.
> > And it says that at shutdown, it is copied to global.
> > What happens if postgres do
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Rodrigo Barboza wrote:
> Hi, guys.
> Postgres doc says it is better to place the pgstat.stat file in ram disk.
> And it says that at shutdown, it is copied to global.
> What happens if postgres do not shutdown the usual way?
> If machine loses power, for example...
25 matches
Mail list logo
