Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity

2009-09-04 Thread Tom Lane
"Lee, Mija" writes: > Again, 5 extra processes. 6939 is one example. I'm not sure what you are > looking for from this command that is different from ps -ef? > Update_process_title is turned on. 5 extra processes would be exactly what I'd expect in an 8.3 installation. I don't remember the mag

Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity

2009-09-04 Thread Lee, Mija
Calvo Franco; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lee, Mija wrote: > I got it once I pointed to the ucb ps per Alvaro's suggestion. Thanks! Here's what I see with a ps auwx : So what do

Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity

2009-09-04 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lee, Mija wrote: > I got it once I pointed to the ucb ps per Alvaro's suggestion. Thanks! Here's > what I see with a ps auwx : So what does ps ax|grep postgres say? -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscri

Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity

2009-09-04 Thread Lee, Mija
y/what they are before doing so. Mija -Original Message- From: Emanuel Calvo Franco [mailto:postgres@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 11:01 AM To: Lee, Mija Cc: Scott Marlowe; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activit

Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity

2009-09-04 Thread Emanuel Calvo Franco
2009/9/4 Lee, Mija : > Hi - > Thanks for the response. > I'm on solaris so the ps ax doesn't work for me. I think the equivalent > is ps -ef which shows: > postgres  6939 22678   0 15:49:49 ?           1:33 > /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2 > postgres 22678 16072   0   Aug 06 ?  

Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity

2009-09-04 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Lee, Mija escribió: > Hi - > Thanks for the response. > I'm on solaris so the ps ax doesn't work for me. I think the equivalent > is ps -ef which shows: hmm, did you try /usr/ucb/ps? -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command

Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity

2009-09-04 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Lee, Mija wrote: > Hi - > Thanks for the response. > I'm on solaris so the ps ax doesn't work for me. I think the equivalent > is ps -ef which shows: > postgres  6939 22678   0 15:49:49 ?           1:33 > /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2 > postgres

Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity

2009-09-04 Thread Lee, Mija
tgres processes that don't make a connection? Mija -Original Message- From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:scott.marl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 7:54 PM To: Lee, Mija Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity

Re: [ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity

2009-09-03 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Lee, Mija wrote: > Hello: > I have a server that has many more postgres processes (postgres -D > , owned by postgres, listed with an ps -ef) than connections in > pg_stat_activity. How can I find out what those processes are? > I have been going through the docs and

[ADMIN] postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity

2009-09-03 Thread Lee, Mija
Hello: I have a server that has many more postgres processes (postgres -D , owned by postgres, listed with an ps -ef) than connections in pg_stat_activity. How can I find out what those processes are? I have been going through the docs and found a reference to if the autovacuum launcher should show