On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:04:53AM -0500, Mark Steben wrote:
> The choices we see are:
[. . .]
I think this is likely to depend almost entirely on benchmarking your case,
and testing the different possibilities. That said, except in extremely
well-defined cases, it's often not a bad idea to make
On Jan 2, 2008 9:04 AM, Mark Steben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Postgres admin team,
>
> We are upgrading from Postgres 7.4.5 to 8.2.5 in mid January. We are also
> adding new disks
>
> As we go. I am investigating using the new tablespace facility to move our
> biggest and most accessed
I th
Postgres admin team,
I posed this question last week. Probably a bad week to ask questions as
many people off
For the holidays so response was light. Thanks to Pete Eisentraut for his
feedback.
I'd like to pose the question again. Our upgrade time-table is getting
close. Any and
All f
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2007 schrieb Mark Steben:
> As we go. I am investigating using the new tablespace facility to move our
> biggest and most accessed
I didn't see anything in your description about having the WAL on a separate
disk. You should include that in your plans.
--
Peter Eisent