Re: [BUGS] Need default password for the user sa

2008-08-26 Thread Dave Page
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Janardhanachari, Jagadeesha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HI, Thanks for your reply, but tell me what is the default password for postgres on windows environment ? Assuming you used the installer, whatever password you entered when prompted. It won't let you

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4374: pg_restore does not restore public schema comment

2008-08-26 Thread Daniel Migowski
Hallo Craig, Craig Ringer schrieb: So: the user's report is incorrect in blaming pg_restore, but correct in that comments on the public schema (and presumably other default schema) aren't preserved by pg_dump | pg_restore. The real reason appears to be that they're not dumped in the first

[BUGS] BUG #4376: Running as a database

2008-08-26 Thread Cong
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4376 Logged by: Cong Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.2 Operating system: WindowXP Description:Running as a database Details: Make it as a database but i don't know how to convert it

Re: [BUGS] Problem with planer

2008-08-26 Thread Eugen.Konkov
can you share the PostgreSQL version you are using PG8.3.1 maybe you are facing some sort of corruption? I do not know. All other works fine except that. - Original Message - From: Hans-Juergen Schoenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Sent:

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4281: some types of errors do not log statements

2008-08-26 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Thomas H. wrote: maybe its by design (to not insert badly encoded characters into the utf8 encoded logs)? nevertheless to debug those faulty programm/codes, it would help to see what query provokes the error... Well, the problem is mainly that there is no query, because the bytes arriving are

[BUGS] Aborted VACUUM FULL - crash + corruption (xlog non-existent)

2008-08-26 Thread Peter Schuller
Hello, [note: in pastes below, the only thing changes are database names and hostnames, for privacy reasons; otherwise plain cut'n'paste including typos...) Very short version: I cancelled a VACUUM FULL; server crashed; won't start again because it tries to access an obsolete WAL log file that

Re: [BUGS] Aborted VACUUM FULL - crash + corruption (xlog non-existent)

2008-08-26 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Peter Schuller wrote: The pg_xlog directory contains: -rw--- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Aug 26 17:16 0001001800EE drwx-- 2 postgres postgres 305232 Aug 26 17:14 archive_status Note that the archival of the ED xlog file started at 17:14:52, and I cancelled

Re: [BUGS] Aborted VACUUM FULL - crash + corruption (xlog non-existent)

2008-08-26 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Peter Schuller wrote: I will go hide in a corner now... FWIW, as soon as you come out of the corner, you can solve the problem easily by manually copying the file back from the archive location into pg_xlog and restarting the server. -- Alvaro Herrera

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4281: some types of errors do not log statements

2008-08-26 Thread Gregory Stark
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas H. wrote: maybe its by design (to not insert badly encoded characters into the utf8 encoded logs)? nevertheless to debug those faulty programm/codes, it would help to see what query provokes the error... Well, the problem is mainly that

Re: [BUGS] Behavior change in PG8.3?

2008-08-26 Thread Tom Lane
Zahid Khan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I see one behavior change is PG8.3 and PG 8.2 .I was getting error  of underflow value in PG8.2  when i tried to insert '1E-307' in double precision column .And my application was expecting the same error condition with the same values  against PG 8.3.3

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4281: some types of errors do not log statements

2008-08-26 Thread Tom Lane
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, the problem is mainly that there is no query, because the bytes arriving are garbage. A human observer could make sense of it in some cases, but not a computer in the general case. How is that

Re: [BUGS] non-deterministic error related to MIN/MAX optimization

2008-08-26 Thread Jeff Davis
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 01:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Please provide some more detail about those experiments. The test case hasn't been seen to fail in the buildfarm, AFAIR. Dan Farina, my colleague at Truviso, was experimenting with some query transformations that pushed the range table entries

Re: [BUGS] non-deterministic error related to MIN/MAX optimization

2008-08-26 Thread Tom Lane
Jeff Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: = -- make foo into a subquery and add a no-op = -- to prevent it from pulling up the subquery = select max(a), generate_series(1,2) as g from (select a as a from foo offset 0) dummy; ERROR: set-valued function called in context that cannot accept a set

Re: [BUGS] non-deterministic error related to MIN/MAX optimization

2008-08-26 Thread Pavel Stehule
2008/8/26 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jeff Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: = -- make foo into a subquery and add a no-op = -- to prevent it from pulling up the subquery = select max(a), generate_series(1,2) as g from (select a as a from foo offset 0) dummy; ERROR: set-valued function called