Helo
I am working on spring project with postgres 8.4
i wrote a function in postgrees which i am passing the argument email
email[] array
From front end we need to insesrt data into that emailarray .so i used
java.arraylist.util
while i am running i got the following error Please help me
Helo
I am working on spring project with postgres 8.4
i wrote a function in postgrees which i am passing the argument email
email[] array
From front end we need to insesrt data into that emailarray .so i used
java.arraylist.util
while i am running i got the following error Please help me
Helo
I am working on spring project with postgres 8.4
i wrote a function in postgrees which i am passing the argument email
email[] array
From front end we need to insesrt data into that emailarray .so i used
java.arraylist.util
while i am running i got the following error Please help me
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ravi nm.ravi2...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:21 PM
Subject:
To: Prasanthi itsbeu...@gmail.com
Method in Dao
public void savePerson(Person person, ListAddress addresses, ListEmail
emails, ListPhone numbers){
call.withProcedureName(
show details 5:21 PM (19 minutes ago)
Method in Dao
public void savePerson(Person person, ListAddress addresses, ListEmail
emails, ListPhone numbers){
call.withProcedureName(
person_save1);
MapString, Object out = call.execute(new
PGPerson(person),addresses,null,null);
}
Was this ever addressed?
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm not sure whether we'd want to provide a function within libpq
for this, or just
Kris Jurka bo...@ejurka.com wrote:
You need to pass an instance of java.sql.Array, not a Collection
or something else that is array like.
Ah, right. After extracting an array from the java.util.ArrayList,
it needs to be turned into a java.sql.Array using the
Connection.createArrayOf method.
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Was this ever addressed?
It should probably be on the TODO list. I was going to try to do
this along with other items which came out of generating an LSB
conforming init script, but have been pulled in different directions
for now. When I get the time
Kevin Grittner wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Was this ever addressed?
It should probably be on the TODO list. I was going to try to do
this along with other items which came out of generating an LSB
conforming init script, but have been pulled in different directions
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5339
Logged by: Jonathan Duke Leto
Email address: jonat...@leto.net
PostgreSQL version: master 0f50d482
Operating system: CentOS 5.4 (Linux kernel 2.6.18)
Description:Version of Perl detected incorrectly
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I think you should just edit the TODO wiki and list all the things
we agree need fixing
Will do. It may take me a while to chase down all the issues from
the LSB script work.
If I recall correctly, some of what I was looking at seems necessary
for a
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:57, Jonathan jonat...@leto.net wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5339
Logged by: Jonathan Duke Leto
Email address: jonat...@leto.net
PostgreSQL version: master 0f50d482
Operating system: CentOS 5.4 (Linux kernel
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:44, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:57, Jonathan jonat...@leto.net wrote:
configure: using perl
configure: WARNING:
*** The installed version of Perl, /home/leto/bin/perl, is too old to use
with PostgreSQL.
*** Perl version 5.8 or
Alex Hunsaker escribió:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:57, Jonathan jonat...@leto.net wrote:
checking for perl... /home/leto/bin/perl
configure: using perl
configure: WARNING:
*** The installed version of Perl, /home/leto/bin/perl, is too old to use
with PostgreSQL.
*** Perl version 5.8
Using
perl -e 'use 5.008010'
would be a more reliable way for configure to test the perl version.
Tim.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:57:56PM +, Jonathan Duke Leto wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5339
Logged by: Jonathan Duke Leto
Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:57, Jonathan jonat...@leto.net wrote:
This is perl 5, version 11, subversion 4 (v5.11.4-114-ga4cc961*) built for
x86_64-linux
Ugh. Can't they manage to keep that message reasonably consistent?
! perl_version_error=`$PERL
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5340
Logged by: pradeep
Email address: patilpradeep...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 1.10.1
Operating system: windows 7
Description:Requirement of different syntax on different OS
Details:
If I am using
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:51 PM, pradeep patilpradeep...@yahoo.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5340
Logged by: pradeep
Email address: patilpradeep...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 1.10.1
Operating system: windows 7
Description:
Howdy,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:57, Jonathan jonat...@leto.net wrote:
This is perl 5, version 11, subversion 4 (v5.11.4-114-ga4cc961*) built for
x86_64-linux
Ugh. Can't they
Jonathan Leto jonat...@leto.net writes:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
This is perl 5, version 11, subversion 4 (v5.11.4-114-ga4cc961*) built for
x86_64-linux
Ugh. Can't they manage to keep that message reasonably consistent?
The form of the version
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 13:07, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes:
! perl_version_error=`$PERL -e 'use 5.00801;' 21`
This is not a path towards an acceptable solution, as it effectively
assumes what we are setting out to prove, namely that we have
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:17:57PM -0700, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 13:07, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes:
! perl_version_error=`$PERL -e 'use 5.00801;' 21`
This is not a path towards an acceptable solution, as it effectively
Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes:
How about something like the below?
I still think that this is optimizing the wrong thing. We care about
the clarity of the message the user sees, not about how short or clean
the Perl code is. I'm inclined to stay with the same basic
implementation and
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 14:17, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 13:07, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes:
! perl_version_error=`$PERL -e 'use 5.00801;' 21`
...
How about something like the below?
Find attached one that
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 14:31, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes:
How about something like the below?
I still think that this is optimizing the wrong thing. We care about
the clarity of the message the user sees, not about how short or clean
the Perl
Howdy,
First, thanks to everyone for the quick responses to my bug report.
The output format of perl -v has been reasonably consistent for well
over a decade, eg (examples captured from various machines around my
house)
This is perl, version 4.0
This is perl, v5.8.7 built for
Michael Renner wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Michael Renner wrote:
Mentioning PGHOST in pg_ctl's
manpage/documentation should make this entirely clear for people who
aren't familiar with the extensive environment variables PostgreSQLs
client library can use. [1]
Yeah, this has
Dave Page wrote:
This was posted as a documentation comment:
to_char(interval '0d 0h 12m 44s', 'DD HH MI SS');
with HH and HH12 will return 12 instead of 0.
Testing on 8.4.1, it does seem to be the case that you get 00 12 12
44. Seems bogus to me, but am I and the OP missing something?
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
This was posted as a documentation comment:
to_char(interval '0d 0h 12m 44s', 'DD HH MI SS');
with HH and HH12 will return 12 instead of 0.
Testing on 8.4.1, it does seem to be the case that you get 00 12 12
44. Seems bogus to me, but am I and
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5341
Logged by: Jaime Mendieta
Email address: mendie...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.2
Operating system: Windows Vista
Description:problema al iniciar pgadmin
Details:
cuando termino de instalar postgres
bruce wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
This was posted as a documentation comment:
to_char(interval '0d 0h 12m 44s', 'DD HH MI SS');
with HH and HH12 will return 12 instead of 0.
Testing on 8.4.1, it does seem to be the case that you get 00 12 12
44. Seems bogus to me, but am I and the OP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:42:30AM +, Jaime Mendieta wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5341
[...]
cuando termino de instalar postgres 8.4.2 me sale un cuadro que dice
Problem running post-install step.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 14:31, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm inclined to stay with the same basic
implementation and just hack up the regexp some more to cope with 5.11's
more verbose -v output.
And here is a stab at that:
$ echo This is perl, version 4.0 | sed -n 's/This is
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 00:50, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 14:31, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm inclined to stay with the same basic
implementation and just hack up the regexp some more to cope with 5.11's
more verbose -v output.
And here is a stab
34 matches
Mail list logo
