Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > I think you should just edit the TODO wiki and list all the things > we agree need fixing Will do. It may take me a while to chase down all the issues from the LSB script work. If I recall correctly, some of what I was looking at seems necessary for a well-behaved LSB conforming script, and there was support for the ideas from some quarters, but it fell short of what I'd consider a consensus (for example, escalating the stop request level over time). Do we want to get into a discussion of such issues at this point, add them to the list with a note that discussion is needed before undertaking them, or should I keep them just in my own list? A couple comments which I think were the last on the escalation of stop mode: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg01145.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg01158.php Before continuing that discussion, I think we need to decide if *now is the time* to continue that discussion (and other related ones); and I would argue such discussion should wait. These links are just provided to help answer the question of what I should do with such disputed issues when I update the TODO list. I don't want to slip something in without consensus, but I don't want the issue to be lost, or missed by anyone who takes on pg_ctl work. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
