Title: Signature
Greg,
Obviously I do not agree. When 14 different databases by 14 different
DBMS vendors from the largest to the smallest in the market can do a
simple thing as a using a subquery that has distinct keyword and your
DBMS can't, I would say your DBMS is at fault and is not
Title: Signature
Craig
I am not asking you to re-write my sql so the bug will not show. I am
presenting you with sql that fails and shows the bug. If every time
someone reported a bug you ask them to re-write their sql so the bug is
not hit, that would not eliminate the bug.
Also, you are
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
I don't think dumps must be human-readable is an argument to reject
such a switch, as long as it's off by default. And I haven't seen any
other valid argument either, so +1 from me.
Well as Bruce said this option won't solve the OP's problem,
Farid Zidan fa...@zidsoft.com writes:
I am not asking you to re-write my sql so the bug will not show. I am
presenting you with sql that fails and shows the bug. If every time
someone reported a bug you ask them to re-write their sql so the bug
is not hit, that would not eliminate the bug.
Dimitri
This is the last you will hear from me about this issue. I would have
stopped repsonding long time ago, but I kept getting responses that
required reply. Do not knock on the door if you don't want someone to
answer the door.
There is no point in spending more of my time explaining
On 5/06/2010 9:39 PM, Farid Zidan wrote:
Craig
I am not asking you to re-write my sql so the bug will not show. I am
presenting you with sql that fails and shows the bug.
Before writing this off completely, please read on. I suspect I may've
misunderstood your argument, and on further
