On 05/04/2012 06:46 AM, milen_laza...@yahoo.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6625
Logged by: Milen
Email address: milen_laza...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.3.0
Operating system: windows xp
Description:
i can't complete the
On 05/23/2012 04:00 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:43 AM,subu@gmail.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6647
Logged by: Subramanian
Email address: subu@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.3
Operating system:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Craig Ringer ring...@ringerc.id.au wrote:
On 05/23/2012 04:00 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:43 AM,subu@gmail.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6647
Logged by: Subramanian
Email
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6667
Logged by: Dmitry Turin
Email address: dmitrytu...@narod.ru
PostgreSQL version: Unsupported/Unknown
Operating system: windows
Description:
Excuse me, that i forced to ask via this form, but i did
Hi I am created a function
CREATE FUNCTION one(float,float) RETURNS float AS $$
select $1+$2 AS result;
$$ LANGUAGE SQL;
Its worked
Then
I droped the function
Drop function one(float,float)
Its also worked
Then I typed
Select one(18.5,12.4)
Ho… the result appers as 31.9
Fijil Stephen fijil.step...@mooobleiit.com writes:
Hi I am created a function
CREATE FUNCTION one(float,float) RETURNS float AS $$
select $1+$2 AS result;
$$ LANGUAGE SQL;
Its worked
Then
I droped the function
Drop function one(float,float)
Its also worked
Then I
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Thangalin thanga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Robert.
$ psql --version
psql (PostgreSQL) 9.1.2
D J
[rhaas ~]$ createdb superdatabase
[rhaas ~]$ psql superdatabase
Line style is old-ascii.
psql (9.1.2)
Type help for help.
superdatabase=# create schema
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org mailto:mp...@debian.org writes:
while packaging 9.2 beta 1 for Debian/Ubuntu the postgresql-common
test suite noticed a regression: It seems that pg_restore --data-only
now skips the current value of sequences, so that in
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:49:31AM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
If you can help me find out how these got defined this way, I might be
able to prevent this problem for the next person.
After reading the above thread here is what the queries mentioned return:
production=# SELECT
On 05/24/2012 11:14 AM, gilsonla...@yahoo.com wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6663
Logged by: Gilson Lasco
Email address: gilsonla...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.3
Operating system: Linux Ubuntu 12.04 x64
Description:
while
On 05/29/2012 05:44 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:49:31AM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
If you can help me find out how these got defined this way, I might be
able to prevent this problem for the next person.
After reading the above thread here is what the queries
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:13:24PM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
This moved the helper functions into pg_catalog, but the author probably
didn't realize that public schema helper functions would continue to be
dumped by pg_dump. These helper functions continued to be
dumped/restored until the
12 matches
Mail list logo
