>> Well, the part I understood was that your fix apparently does not
>> guarantee to restore plpgsql to the state it was in, just to restore
>> it to existence. But previous complaints about similar issues have
>> fallen on deaf ears (see bug #5184). Perhaps Tom has had a change of
>> heart, but
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:32:10PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:21:58AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian writes:
> >> >>> address the points I made about reproducing the previous state in cases
> >> >>> wh
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:21:58AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> >>> address the points I made about reproducing the previous state in cases
>> >>> where the admin removed the language or changed its permissions.
>>
>> >>
Okay. I guess so. Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Payal
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:21:06PM -0400, Payal Singh wrote:
> > If something was wrong with the cluster, why did vacuumdb on new server
> run
> > successfully when I followed Craig's s
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:21:06PM -0400, Payal Singh wrote:
> If something was wrong with the cluster, why did vacuumdb on new server run
> successfully when I followed Craig's suggestion of running vacuumdb on old
> server first, before performing the upgrade, and then ran vacuumdb on new one?
M
If something was wrong with the cluster, why did vacuumdb on new server run
successfully when I followed Craig's suggestion of running vacuumdb on old
server first, before performing the upgrade, and then ran vacuumdb on new
one?
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:03:38PM -0400, Payal Singh wrote:
> The omnipitr-backup-slave process takes online backups from the standby, and
> this is done everyday. This process connects to the master and calls a
> pg_start_backup and then looks for a restore point on the standby after that
> WAL a
The omnipitr-backup-slave process takes online backups from the standby,
and this is done everyday. This process connects to the master and calls a
pg_start_backup and then looks for a restore point on the standby after
that WAL address. So i don't think I need to shut down the server.
Also, it is
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 02:22:28PM -0400, Payal Singh wrote:
> The first message in the log is probably because the backup is taken from a
> standby. I am using omnipitr-backup-slave to make the backups and then
> restoring one of those.
OK, this is what I wanted to see. Is the server running whi
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:20:21PM -0400, Payal Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I restored the backup on 9.1, made sure the database reached a consistent
> state
> and checkpointed. Then I performed the upgrade. Upgrade completed successfully
> but on running vacuumdb it gave the exact same error. The con
Excerpts from runner.mei's message of mié jul 04 10:03:42 -0400 2012:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 6716
> Logged by: runner.mei
> Email address: runner@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.1.3
> Operating system: win2003
> Descriptio
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Peter Arnold wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> my distribution comes from
>
> http://www.enterprisedb.com/products-services-training/pgdownload#osx.
>
> meanwhile we installed Postgres 8.4.12
> and changed the link from /usr/lib/libpq.5.dylib to /usr/lib/libpq.5.3.dylib
> an
Hi Dave,
my distribution comes from
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products-services-training/pgdownload#osx.
meanwhile we installed Postgres 8.4.12
and changed the link from /usr/lib/libpq.5.dylib to /usr/lib/libpq.5.3.dylib
and both, postgeSQL and Webserver are working.
Is it a good Idea to
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:29 AM, wrote:
>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Bug reference: 6721
>> Logged by: Peter Arnold
>> Email address: peter.arn...@jd-ag.com
>> PostgreSQL version: 9.0.8
>> Operatin
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:29 AM, wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 6721
> Logged by: Peter Arnold
> Email address: peter.arn...@jd-ag.com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.0.8
> Operating system: MAC OSX
> Description:
>
> Hi,
>
> after i inst
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6721
Logged by: Peter Arnold
Email address: peter.arn...@jd-ag.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.8
Operating system: MAC OSX
Description:
Hi,
after i install PostgreSQL 9.0.8 on my MAC with OSX 10.7.4 the WEB
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 08:12 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 07/06/2012 03:57 AM, balaj...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The following bug has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Bug reference: 6720
> > Logged by: balaji
> > Email address: balaj...@gmail.com
> > PostgreSQL version: Unsuppo
17 matches
Mail list logo
