On 13 June 2012 00:54, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>> I note that "postgres -C data_directory" will refuse to run on the
>>> command line because I've got admin privileges in Windows, and that
>>> pg_ctl normally starts postgres.exe using CreateRestrictedProcess.
>>> But it does not do so for the popen ca
On 26 May 2012 01:10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Ah, turns out I only need one extra log file on Windows, not two,
> because I can reuse the utility file for pg_ctl stop. The original
> beta1 code usesd the utility file for pg_ctl stop and start, which is
> what caused the problem.
>
> Applied patch
On 12 June 2012 14:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> Edmund Horner writes:
>> On 12 June 2012 14:23, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hm, that patch seems to be several bricks shy of a load. I will fix
>>> two obvious bugs in it:
>>> (1) not dump core on boxes where printf("%s
On 12 June 2012 14:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> Edmund Horner writes:
>> In 9.1, if I run "pg_ctl start" without providing way for it to find
>> the datadir, it prints the error:
>
>> C:\ehorner\pgsql-old\bin>pg_ctl start
>> pg_ctl: no database d
In 9.1, if I run "pg_ctl start" without providing way for it to find
the datadir, it prints the error:
C:\ehorner\pgsql-old\bin>pg_ctl start
pg_ctl: no database directory specified and environment variable
PGDATA unset
Try "pg_ctl --help" for more information.
In 9.2 (beta1 and beta2)
On 9 June 2012 03:48, Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Edmund Horner wrote:
>> On 1 June 2012 12:36, Edmund Horner wrote:
>>> On 1 June 2012 12:14, Edmund Horner wrote:
>>>> I tried using an older libxml2.dll. Replace with the one from
>&
On 1 June 2012 12:36, Edmund Horner wrote:
> On 1 June 2012 12:14, Edmund Horner wrote:
>> I tried using an older libxml2.dll. Replace with the one from
>> ftp://ftp.zlatkovic.com/libxml/oldreleases/libxml2-2.6.9.win32.zip
>> (and copying zlib1.dll to zlib.dll), and it wor
On 1 June 2012 12:14, Edmund Horner wrote:
> I tried using an older libxml2.dll. Replace with the one from
> ftp://ftp.zlatkovic.com/libxml/oldreleases/libxml2-2.6.9.win32.zip
> (and copying zlib1.dll to zlib.dll), and it works.
>
> I note that the previous 9.1.3 binaries used th
On 31 May 2012 14:14, Edmund Horner wrote:
> Hello, apologies if this is already in your radar.
>
> I can successfully install the PostgreSQL 9.2 beta1 binaries on
> Windows XP and successfully perform most queries. However I've run
> into some trouble with the XML supp
Hello, apologies if this is already in your radar.
I can successfully install the PostgreSQL 9.2 beta1 binaries on
Windows XP and successfully perform most queries. However I've run
into some trouble with the XML support.
>From a very cursory search I did not see anything changed since 9.1.3
tha
On 25 May 2012 11:48, Edmund Horner wrote:
> It still fails (when run in verbose mode):
Sorry, let me correct that to:
It still fails, regardless of verbose mode. And, in verbose mode, the
output is...
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to y
On 25 May 2012 01:59, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:42:25PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I've built a new one off git master + Bruce's patch. You can get it
>> from http://www.hagander.net/tmp/pg_upgrade.zip - please see if that
>> one works for you.
>
> Thanks, but thinkin
On 24 May 2012 12:33, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have applied the attached patch which should fix the problem. How
> can we get Edmund a copy of a new binary for testing? Does he have to
> wait for beta2?
My uneducated guess is that your patch will fix the problem.
But I don't think I'm up to c
On 22 May 2012 18:49, Craig Ringer wrote:
> When you shut down the 9.1.3 cluster did you make absolutely certain there
> were no postgres.exe processes lurking around when you tested? Given the
> incredible thouroughness of your report I imagine you did, but it's worth
> checking, as a lingering `
(Sending this again to pgsql-bugs with no attachments; hopefully it'll
be accepted. Apologies for any duplicates! I'll provide the
attachments if you need them, though I suspect things may become clear
without them.)
Hello,
I'm forwarding this to pgsql-bugs after sending it to pgsql-testers.
I'
Hum. My first email sent to this list a few days ago still has not
arrived, so these two are kind of orphaned. Should I resend it?
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
On 18 May 2012 23:06, Edmund Horner wrote:
> I ran into a bit of trouble running pg_upgrade to upgrade from my
> 9.1.3 cluster. This is the first time I have run pg_upgrade. It is
> entirely possible I've done something wrong.
>
> As a control, I was able to success
17 matches
Mail list logo
