On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see VACUUM making VACUUM FULL faster. I don't think VACUUM FULL
should make VACUUM FULL ANALYZE faster.
Err, let me correct myself. A second VACUUM FULL should be faster
than the first one. But the two together
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Eric Pailleau e...@numlog.fr wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5322
Logged by: Eric Pailleau
Email address: e...@numlog.fr
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.3
Operating system: linux debian
Description: Time
Robert Haas a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see VACUUM making VACUUM FULL faster. I don't think VACUUM FULL
should make VACUUM FULL ANALYZE faster.
Err, let me correct myself. A second VACUUM FULL should be faster
than the first
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5322
Logged by: Eric Pailleau
Email address: e...@numlog.fr
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.3
Operating system: linux debian
Description:Time to perform vacuums
Details:
Hello,
I really don't know if it can be a bug