On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 2:28 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> + * file just as if this were not an incremental backup. The contents of the
> + * relative_block_numbers array is unspecified in this case.
>
> Perhaps you mean s/is/are/ here? The contents are what's not
> specified.
Thanks, fixed. Duh
Fix grammar.
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZhdKqj5DwoOzirFv%40paquier.xyz
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/942219996c632ae9e66c2c4a759e93abc92014ff
Modified Files
--
src/backend/backup/basebackup_incrementa
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:53:24AM +, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Fix potential stack overflow in incremental backup.
>
> The user can set RELSEG_SIZE to a high number at compile time, so we
> can't use it to control the size of an array on the stack: it could be
> many gigabytes in size
Fix potential stack overflow in incremental backup.
The user can set RELSEG_SIZE to a high number at compile time, so we
can't use it to control the size of an array on the stack: it could be
many gigabytes in size. On closer inspection, we don't really need that
intermediate array anyway. Let's
Fix inconsistency with replay of hash squeeze record for clean buffers
aa5edbe379d6 has tweaked _hash_freeovflpage() so as the write buffer's
LSN is updated only when necessary, when REGBUF_NO_CHANGE is not used.
The replay code was not consistent with that, causing the write buffer's
LSN to be u
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:25 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro writes:
> > If -Dssl=none and -Dgssapi=disabled, compilation of fe-connect.c
> > fails: call to undeclared function 'encryption_negotiation_failed'. I
> > didn't look too hard, but maybe ENABLE_GSS and USE_GSS are confused?
>
> For
Thomas Munro writes:
> If -Dssl=none and -Dgssapi=disabled, compilation of fe-connect.c
> fails: call to undeclared function 'encryption_negotiation_failed'. I
> didn't look too hard, but maybe ENABLE_GSS and USE_GSS are confused?
For me, configure --with-gssapi fails like that, but the other th
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 1:25 PM Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> Refactor libpq state machine for negotiating encryption
>
> This fixes the few corner cases noted in commit 705843d294, as shown
> by the changes in the test.
>
> Author: Heikki Linnakangas, Matthias van de Meent
> Reviewed-by: Jacob Champ
Fix plpgsql's handling of -- comments following expressions.
Up to now, read_sql_construct() has collected all the source text from
the statement or expression's initial token up to the character just
before the "until" token. It normally tries to strip trailing
whitespace from that, largely for
Fix plpgsql's handling of -- comments following expressions.
Up to now, read_sql_construct() has collected all the source text from
the statement or expression's initial token up to the character just
before the "until" token. It normally tries to strip trailing
whitespace from that, largely for
Fix plpgsql's handling of -- comments following expressions.
Up to now, read_sql_construct() has collected all the source text from
the statement or expression's initial token up to the character just
before the "until" token. It normally tries to strip trailing
whitespace from that, largely for
Fix plpgsql's handling of -- comments following expressions.
Up to now, read_sql_construct() has collected all the source text from
the statement or expression's initial token up to the character just
before the "until" token. It normally tries to strip trailing
whitespace from that, largely for
Fix plpgsql's handling of -- comments following expressions.
Up to now, read_sql_construct() has collected all the source text from
the statement or expression's initial token up to the character just
before the "until" token. It normally tries to strip trailing
whitespace from that, largely for
Fix plpgsql's handling of -- comments following expressions.
Up to now, read_sql_construct() has collected all the source text from
the statement or expression's initial token up to the character just
before the "until" token. It normally tries to strip trailing
whitespace from that, largely for
On 10/04/2024 17:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 08.04.24 01:50, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Add tests for libpq gssencmode and sslmode options
Why aren't these tests at
src/interfaces/libpq/t/nnn_negotiate_encryption.pl ?
To be honest, it never occurred to me. It started out as extra tests
un
On 08.04.24 01:50, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Add tests for libpq gssencmode and sslmode options
Why aren't these tests at
src/interfaces/libpq/t/nnn_negotiate_encryption.pl ?
Test all combinations of gssencmode, sslmode, whether the server
supports SSL and/or GSSAPI encryption, and whether
Doc: Update ulinks to RFC documents to avoid redirect
The tools.ietf.org site has been decommissioned and replaced by a
number of sites serving various purposes. Links to RFCs and BCPs
are now 301 redirected to their new respective IETF sites. Since
this serves no purpose and only adds network o
Doc: Update ulinks to RFC documents to avoid redirect
The tools.ietf.org site has been decommissioned and replaced by a
number of sites serving various purposes. Links to RFCs and BCPs
are now 301 redirected to their new respective IETF sites. Since
this serves no purpose and only adds network o
Doc: Update ulinks to RFC documents to avoid redirect
The tools.ietf.org site has been decommissioned and replaced by a
number of sites serving various purposes. Links to RFCs and BCPs
are now 301 redirected to their new respective IETF sites. Since
this serves no purpose and only adds network o
Doc: Update ulinks to RFC documents to avoid redirect
The tools.ietf.org site has been decommissioned and replaced by a
number of sites serving various purposes. Links to RFCs and BCPs
are now 301 redirected to their new respective IETF sites. Since
this serves no purpose and only adds network o
Doc: Update ulinks to RFC documents to avoid redirect
The tools.ietf.org site has been decommissioned and replaced by a
number of sites serving various purposes. Links to RFCs and BCPs
are now 301 redirected to their new respective IETF sites. Since
this serves no purpose and only adds network o
Doc: Update ulinks to RFC documents to avoid redirect
The tools.ietf.org site has been decommissioned and replaced by a
number of sites serving various purposes. Links to RFCs and BCPs
are now 301 redirected to their new respective IETF sites. Since
this serves no purpose and only adds network o
On 10.04.24 01:11, David Rowley wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 00:05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
This patch introduces in bump.c the macro BumpBlockIsValid(), but it's
not used anywhere. Can we remove it?
I've just pushed a patch to remove it.
Was that spotted by eagle eyes or tooling?
I used
23 matches
Mail list logo
